|
All comments will be posted here and some have asked to have new comments on top so we aim
to please!
Date: Jul 31, 2010 4:31 PM
name: Shirley Blaylock
comment: Social Security has an interface with IRS. Both are aware of invalid SSN's and
where illegal workers are.No one is paying taxes on an invalid SSN. They may be working under someone else's SSN (disabled
child or stolen card for instance) but rarely are they paying taxes. Most are working under the table in the agriculture and
construction undustries. Employers do not care if they are employing illegals. Kick the illegals out and prosecute the employers.
We've got enough domestic crooks, we don't need to import them.
Date: Jul 27, 2010 4:46 PM
name: MM
comment: This morning I am compelled to address what seems to be a grand awakening. Now,
in my opinion:
The BP spill was orchestrated by a group of World Order enthusiasts. How can we not look at the
Goldman Sachs sale of most or all their BP stock just three days before the spill. What is it they knew that the rest
of us didn't. Ask: Why are we the American people, with ideas of greatness. not taking a better look at who is
running the government now. Blame the Progressive press for that one. Not only has the government prolonged the oil
spill solution, but they have deliberately caused a major catastrophe with the order to stop drilling. An order that
was completely unnecessary. Jindal couldn't get the permits to build the berms. The booms were moved from
LA to AL; the booms were gathered by LA. The whole event was staged to cause an immediate disaster. This
planned oil rig destruction was a George Soros financed operation. It was designed to further move the people into Cap
and Trade. Why didn't Obama speak to the CEO of BP? Because Obama didn't want to talk " to a man like that".
He waited until the disaster could grow into what it has become.
When Obama can look the American people in the
eye and tell them "the cost of electricity will necessarily skyrocket", and the media does not expose what this bill will
really do, I am no longer surprised. This bill moves the American people closer to the socialist/communistic ideology.
This is who Obama is. He believes in James Hal Cone's Black Theology from the 60's. He sat in Jeremiah
Wrights' Black Theology church for 20 years. Give me a break. Obama was never vetted by the press and so here
we are!
Don't you find it absolutely insulting to the American intelligence that our Congress does not even read the
bills. The people would vomit on the Health bill if they knew how terribly unfair and threatening it is to our
freedom. Take a look at who he appointed, during a congressional recess, to head up this monumental budgetary
spending bill. None other than Donald Bernwick. He is in charge of a 800 million dollar budget and says "Any Healthcare
plan that is just, equitable, civilized and humane, must redistribute the wealth" . He is a huge proponent
of rationing. My, aren't we lucky. All we really had to do was go after the millions and millions in Medicare
and Medicaid fraud. At least that would have been a start. However, that move would not have produced the control
or the power over the American people.
Date: Jul 23, 2010 1:22 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Re.your last section"Thankful For Comments" Nice to see that you still have
a semblance of your Southern Gentleman roots.If you REALLY mean it that you're going to respond within 2 days to your commenters-when
will that start? What about those that came in early July? Don't lose my e-mail address--You've got huge outstanding
I.O.U chits due--as we speak :-):-) Looking forward to a lovely read--but won't be holding a box of bricks overhead until
you get a "roundtuit". How were your readers told about your terrible car accident?Here in Canada,we knew NOTHING about
it. Last we knew, you were delivering a speech in Chicago at a law school April 22-23 and then had some'other travel plans'Thankfully
,you're still very much with us--bright eyed & bushy tailed as ever!!
Date: Jul 18, 2010 11:25 AM
name: fred kelly grant
comment: Haven't replied to comments in awhile, but Donny of Nevada has good points about
BP oil spill. I haven't made up my mind yet, but i have a deeply imbedded suspicion, that is coming toward the surface
more each day, that no one in the federal government or at BP was really interested in stopping the leak quickly. BP's "cap"
that was put on this week was not just created. Its not equivalent to figuring out how to land a man on the moon.
The device could have been built at the beginning, instead of at the 90th day; so why wasn't it? BP, environmental organizations,
the US Navy, Federal Energy all have creative scientists and engineers, so why didn't this relatively simple construction
idea come forward early on (I realize the construction of is intricate, but the idea is not, and the idea is all that would
have been needed to begin construction of it.
What is the purpose of allowing the spill to spoil an entire region of the
sea and of human endeavors and history in the Gulf states? I don't know. Politically, it could have been designed
to show the need for alterntive energy or for cap and trade---but it should have been obvious that the fall out would hurt
the chances for election of those who favor cap an trade, so I don't buy that political theory. What was in it for the
government vis a vis BP Oil? I could believe that it was the US's role in the BP and English deal for oil that gained
the release of the worst terrorist ever convicted and jailed, so that under fake belief that he was dying he could return
to Libya with a hero's welcome. But, what value does it have for BP? Is it all part of a scheme to show that we
need world government, that problems such as oil spills are beyond the capacity of sovereign nations to handle? That
one would not surprise me. BP's directors are intermingled with companies that support world government and elimination
of United States national sovereignty; they are intermingled with the directorships of Goldman Sachs and others of the financial
"giants" that took us down. They are intermingled with the Trilateral Commission, with the Council on Foreign Relations,
with the Bilderberg Group---all of whom favor world government and their control of the world's economy.
So, what think
you? Intentional spill? Intentional delay in stopping?
And why?
Date: Jul 2, 2010 8:23 AM
name: Jeri Elliott
email: muffinsmaven@aol.com
comment: Let's all send an abundance of our VERY best wishes
to F. Grant the Birthday Guy. May he continue for decades, to be as intellectually inspiring as he has always been and
may he be blessed with all that he wishes for himself,day after day --and then some.One million people were born on July 2--That
makes our Fred ONE IN A MILLION!!
Date: Jun 16, 2010 1:32 PM
comment: In response to your June 13 treatment of Obama admin vs BP; this from a friend in NV -
"Some very good
points made however; it misses the true motive behind the inaction taken by the Executive branch. The longer he stalls, the
worse it gets, thereby adding inarguable strength to his and the liberal agenda along with the environmentalists wackos' agenda!
I
am still very skeptical that the explosion was an "accident" due to neglect on safety standards, this was and is perfect timing
for sabotage. Granted, I may be way off base here and I don't rule that out in my mind but I see no other event like it in
oil platform history. Only in vicious storms have oil platforms failed but you never hear it in the media. Yes it was briefly
discussed on the news a while back but was dismissed out of hand as being a ludicrous idea, I believe that is what the Environmentalists
want us to believe. In fact they would never stoop as low as igniting a well and even sacrificing one of their own as well
as those workers' lives to bring their agenda to bear upon the U.S. It is no secret that these wackos absolutely hate the
U.S.A. and anyone who oppose their "eco" crap. It would be divine justice if they were actually made culpable in this oil
disaster to say the least but I'm hoping for the impossible and I'm most probably wrong about it."
Also consider this
article - Barack Obama will use his first-ever prime time Oval Office address tonight to launch the radical greens all-out
assault on our economy.
Using the BP oil spill as a weapon, Obama will seize on widespread public anger to claim passing
Cap and Tax will hold Big Oil accountable.
The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has breathed new life into legislation aimed
at putting limits on carbon emissions, with President Obama expected to push Congress to pass a bill that addresses both energy
and global warming in a national address, The Washington Examiner reports this morning.
On Tuesday, hours before Obama
delivers his speech, Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., plan to unveil the Environmental Protection
Agencys economic analysis of their energy and global warming bill, which includes a plan to cap carbon emissions.
Well,
you and I know those numbers will be rigged by the EPA and that Obamas lying. You and I know this is nothing more than
a scheme by radical greens to use huge tax hikes and big government control to finally achieve one of their prime goals
downsizing Americans too big prosperity and taking away basic freedoms.
WTP must step up its efforts to combat this Cap
and Tax attack in the media, in the halls of Congress and in the mailboxes and e-mail inboxes of the American people.
Barack
Obama will use a prime-time national Oval Office address tonight as the launching point of a final assault to pass Cap and
Tax.
Sincerely,
Donny Ferguson
Western Tradition Partnership
National Director of Media and Public Relations
Thanks
for the opportunity to share some comments on this disaster, Kathleen Johnson
Date: Jun 14, 2010 5:22 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: To find the combined talents of an accurate & concise historian AND
an articulate writer in the same person is beyond rare. Fred Kelly Grant is such a one. Thank you for your stunningly simple
yet stunningly passionate documentation of this painfully long standing piece of world history.I have NEVER read it so well
expressed.
Date: Jun 14, 2010 5:46 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Re Fred Grants' article re the shameful/shameless BP travesty... This piece is superior to ANY newspaper
reporting/coverage that has ,to date been written. I wish that it could be sent to the correct officials of the White House,,,
I cannot get enough of Fred G's wise opinions!!
Date: Jun 13, 2010 1:26 PM
name: Jake Norman
comment: Heres Jakes Take:
You know, Fred, theres a pretty simple explanation. The people
elected Obama because they wanted change. The change they got - from one man to another and one party to another - is not
the change they wanted, nor is it the one for which they bargained.
The people thought they were electing a man who
would put them first. They trusted he valued them above big campaign funders and special interests. They thought Obama would
make good on his pledges to them. But hes paralyzed and compromised by the need to compensate and repay his benefactors.
Obama
was and is no more capable of delivering on his promises than was George Bush or any other elected official who takes special
interest campaign donations.
Why? Because arousing public support alone doesn't get you elected even though Obama
certainly had plenty of grassroots supporters. Grassroots isnt generally enough.
It takes serious money to shape public
opinion and get out the vote, especially at the presidential level. Serious money just doesnt come in $25 dollar increments.
And while the peoples gratitude, adoration, and high hopes warm the cockles of a politicians heart, they dont buy much.
To
be elected, most politicians court and seek to please the very special interests the people later demand him to stand up to.
And if a candidate stands on principle and refuses such donations, you can be sure his opponent will quite happily take it.
No,
the change the people sought could not possibly happen. That will only come with a truly independent leader who is willing
to stand with integrity, willing to take a big risk by turning down special interest dollars, and willing to do the right
thing for the people, not the system.
Bottom line? Absent a miracle or some great catastrophe that propels such a leader
into office, until we the people match and exceed campaign donations of special interests, you can just wish in one hand and
spit in the other. It's not happening.
Date: Jun 5, 2010 7:16 PM
name: Glen Grosenbach
comment: Mr. Grant,
You said it all so well!
I could not say
it better or
add to it. May The God of
Creation continue to Bless you and inspire you to keep writing and interacting
on behalf of all the FREEDOMS we enjoy. Sincerely, Glen
Date: Jun 1, 2010 8:27 AM
name: Mark Brohman
Date: May 27, 2010 11:44 AM
name: Carol Souza
comment: Awesome article....
Date: May 26, 2010 9:21 AM
name: Kim Dwyer
comment: People are afraid to to defend their country and stand up for their rights because a
few racial minorities have bullied us into thinking that we must behave in a "politically correct" manner. What is at
stake here? Our entire constitution? The integrity of the US border? The sovereignty of our nation? This
issue must be addressed and not distorted....
Date: May 23, 2010 9:46 AM
name: Carolyn Dearing
comment: Clear headed thinking. What does it say about the United States when so many
of our elected and appointed "leaders" use verbiage like "racist" before even reading what our laws actually say?
Date: May 20, 2010 9:09 PM
name: Tresa Glore
comment: Wonderful article!! How can the general public be so very blind to the manipulations
of a corrupted government! Why do people feel that they have a right to freedom and no responsibility to uphold and
protect that freedom. Well done!
Date: May 20, 2010 3:25 PM
name: Adrian Roy Cockerell
comment: Fred,you are right on the money. What a great piece you have written. Lots
of good facts and a great understanding of the law. Well Done! Thanks
Date: May 20, 2010 9:56 AM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Please refer to the questions asked in the comment section of the "Worth Reading"
site They apply equally to this section/blog. A reply would be most appreciated and ,in fact, appropriate.
Date: May 20, 2010 9:50 AM
name: jeri elliott
comment: You've decided to no longer post the feedback / comments that I've sent in --twice--after
Mar 31st---on the 1st blog site, and 2 days ago on this one. I'm now writing to ask whether Fred is no longer
interested in what readers think---highly unlike him---So then, who chooses/ decides what shows up here?
Date: May 19, 2010 9:26 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Thank you Fred, for writing in a balanced, rational clear way about
one of the most misunderstood and misinterpreted "law" of recent times.I wish that news media---(TV & print) in your country
would copy this blog of yours,verbatim.
Date: May 19, 2010 9:01 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Fred ,what a wonderful way with words you have. The visuals created
by your talented writing skills made this "Remember the time that,,,," so much more interesting to read Thank You.
Date: May 11, 2010 11:07 AM
name: Margaret Earldean Grant
comment: Thank you for the beautiful tribute to "mothers" - thank you for including
me in that tribute! I agree wholeheartedly that we have had some amazingly strong women in our lives to save us from
ourselves and our foibles. Good to hear from you and we'll be doing more of that, I promise!! I love you Fred.
Deani
Date: May 9, 2010 8:34 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: To read Fred Grants blog to day would make every mothers heart sing. And those
of us who are not mothers but, like me,are long term committed fans of Fred Kelly ,have singing hearts also -very relieved
to see that he's well enough to do what he loves and that is writing--which he does so superbly.Welcome Back, Sir G-
Date: Apr 21, 2010 9:09 AM
name: Alice Knapp
comment: We don't remember history very well do we? De Tocqueville
understood our uniqueness,
do we?
Date: Apr 20, 2010 10:49 PM
name: Kathleen Moore
comment: Enjoyed learning more about you and your bide. A very interesting read.
Date: Apr 9, 2010 5:44 AM
name: Ruth A Turner
comment: Thank you for speaking as boldly about Christian faith as you do on other topics
close to you.
Date: Apr 7, 2010 2:34 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: H'ray! FredKellyGrant,the contemporary version of THE (ranchers')SAVIOUR has also finally arisen
(surfaced)this Easter. Welcome back and try to make yourself less scarce.I miss you- I'm sure others do to.
Date: Mar 31, 2010 4:37 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Fred Grant has not been heard from on this site since March 3rd. This is VERY unusual
and thus, for me,it raises concern about his well being.Reading his contributions was a good way of knowing that all
is well with him. When will we have the pleasure of 'reading Fred'again?
Date: Mar 23, 2010 6:31 PM
name: Marilyn Mancine
comment: I am wondering why at a time of the great takeover of our entire healthcare system,
you have not made a comment. Your readers, including myself, have always looked forward to your take. I would
say that the complete dismanting of the constitution would be right up your alley. What do you think about the sweetness of
the 26 year old remaining on the parent policy, or the all physical conditions accepted by health plans. Seems to me
that is the sure way to break the insurance companies snd force everyone to a pubic option. Where is your comment that
Obama is a socialist and even a marxist. He is a lier and a traitor. Do you think all the Democrats are as stupid
as Bart Stupak? What about the impact of cost and taxes. Didn't Obama tell us we would get the same coverage as
congress----Is it really legal Mr. Grant for the government to force its' citizens to buy health care?
Mar 22, 2010 7:09 PM
name: Vallea Rose
comment: Good Afternoon,
I felt like I needed to fly my flag 1/2 staff or upside down
today after last nights vote. Come November we vote them out Big Deal the damage has been done. I can not find employment
as I am in Land Use and Planning so I am starting up a new business for women who carry firearms.Hopefully I will not be homeless
next year at this time.
Firearms and Illegals... gotta get those votes at all costs.
Great article.
Thanks,
Vallea
Mar 4, 2010 12:14 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: THANK YOU FRED-- As always,it was a pleasure to read your well balanced
,right on point article. It has the same comfortable 'easy chair' tone that makes your book such a continuing
pleasure. Waiting for your next one will not be easy..Fondly, Jeri--A Canadian FredKelly Grant groupie
Mar 3, 2010 3:46 PM
name: Loyd G. Black
comment: Appreciate what you and others like you are doing to preserve our right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
I
am a member of the NRA and currently involved with helping Daniel Mielke challange Dave Obey in Wisconsin's 7th District.
Dave Obey must go! He has already done enough damage to the Constitution and now will break us as he adds to our unpayable
debt in the trillions.
Feb 9, 2010 9:02 PM
name: Oregon Special
comment: Jon:
I wonder if if would be possible to invert the chronilogical order of the
comment section. I think many would prefer to see the latest comment first rather then continually having to view the
old. Thank you for this consideration.
Feb 6, 2010 11:46 AM
name: Victoria Fleshman
comment: Enjoyed the article - Gotta be a book in there somewhere. There is enough humor
to keep it from getting too dark. Keep it up - Love Ya!
Feb 5, 2010 3:25 PM
name: Anne
comment: Glad to have YOU back writing the blog and that you are back among the living. The Pacific
Ocean beach 50 feet away from my new home will be britening my days as I continue to read your blogs. Want to share ?
Anne
Feb 3, 2010 7:38 AM
name: mohamad reza
comment: helo I am Iranian.
I am a Iranian innovative.
I have inventions very good, but can
not doing in Iran because my country dont support. my inventions very much in different kind, like solar energy and power
station and farming and...
excuse me,I dont know english very good.
Can you help me or can you yuidanse to me?
my
email is (reza_mrm@yahoo.com)
thank you very much
can you help me?
Jan 22, 2010 3:59 AM name:Pharma887
comment: Very nice site! Jan18,20108:22PM name:OregonSpecial
comment: This note is to the January 11th AnneKelly comment regarding global warming.
I am sure that you are now aware of the Gore word change from "global warming" to "climate change". Climate change is accepted
as a truism. I think you might find the work of Gordon J. Fulks, PhD. quite interesting. You may be able to clearly see
why the name change took place. My opinion is that Obama's cap and trade will experience some real oppositon as the facts
indicate a real change took place in climate before there was any carbon dioxide.
I hope you can study this subject further.
Good luck with Dr. Fulks. His work is an eye opener.Jan 14, 2010 11:27 AM name:Joe
Poore comment: I am not sure if I always understand what you write
about but this
one I get, the government finds a way to screw you from the time your born and eveb after you die! keep up the good work!
Jan 11, 2010 11:20 PM name:AnneKelly
comment: If Global Warming is caused by the increase of carbon footprints left by an expansive population growth, and if the
carbon footprints are not controlled globally in the very near future, then our planet as we know it will not survive.
If this is a true fact then would someone who truly understands and thus is able to articulate the causes and effects of global
warming in the 21st Century, please explain to me how this phenomenon, i.e. global warming, differs from the natural occurrence
of global warming during the end of the Pleistocene glacial period.
Or am I being too simplitic?
Jan 4, 2010 3:45PM name: K.A. Holden
comment: Nice. Trying to reach Fred Kelly. Have him get in touch
Jan4,20103:39PM name:Lassie
comment: You need to correct the date from 2090 to 2009 in paragraph 2 line 2.
Jan 2, 2010 8:20 PM name:MarilynMancine
comment: Fred:
I just do not think you are looking at reality this time.By the time your conservative leader emerges, the country will be
lost.The land you now attempt to protect is fast diminishing.Just look at the new Clear Water Act.The new health care program
will take our lives let alone our privacy.Too bad you and myself are not privy to the "whole" health care bill.Our senators
are being bought, and I think some of the administration could be tried for treason. The economy is heading for super inflation;
the dollar will be worthless and Obama wants to be the ruler of some "One World Order". Give me a break Fred.
Jan 2, 2010 11:38 AM name:MickMizner
comment: The trueth will always withstand the test of time!
Thank you to Judge Moore for his clarity!
Jan 2, 2010 11:29 AM name:MickMizner
comment: Thanks Fred for and ideal perspective! We have work to do!
Jan 2, 2010 6:06 AM name:AnneKelly
comment: Hopefully thsi computer will get this message through.
I nominate Minnesota Vikingss' Alan Page, DT, 9 times Pro Bowl and Carl Eller, DE, 6 times Pro Bowl and both at Canton.
Jan 2, 2010 5:56 AM name:AnneKelly
comment: What about Fran Tarkenton of the Minnesota Vikings?
Jan 1, 2010 1:25 AM name:Sally
comment: Yea!! I'm from Wisconsin and have watched those Packers play in a blizzard and minus zero temp. Miss Lombardi.
Now Seattle is a great place to be but miss those old days.
Dec 29, 2009 6:00 PM name: Barbara Craven
comment: What time is your book signing January 2? Thanks, Barbara
Dec 21, 2009 1:41 PM name: Gary Arthur
DeMott
comment: NHS"Bulldog"...Time to have a cup of coffee..BHS"Brave"ie, There is relief for your excerdin headache!!!
Dec 7, 2009 12:00 AM
name:alexk921
comment: Very nice site! |
Dec 3, 2009 8:27 AM
name:NicholasTestaccio
comment: Our movement is essentially a movement without teeth.
I have seen too many cheerleaders, and far too many abuses continued to our supposed enlightenment.
For one, there are too many people who live on the public coffers. That includes welfare, government agencies, and a whole
lot of un-constitutional law enforcement agents. The legal profession from the courts to the traffic lawyer are corrupt beyond
belief.
You all ready know this. Unfortunately the vast majority don't know that when they serve on a jury they must be the ones who
act according to the rule of law because the judge and prosecutor most certainly will not.We must understand that the sheriff
must be made to do the will of the people and not the courts, or unconstitutional acts. |
Nov 25, 2009 10:46 PM
name:Russ McAfee
Comment: Great Site! |
Nov 11, 2009 11:56 AM
name:John-Paul:
comment: I have a judge that has stated in the court room asking the opossing attorney to meet
him in chambers twice to write
and order, the last time 3 were typed and one hand writen. The hand writen was in responce to
a document that I gave to
the court clerk when the judge was on the bench before they went to his chambers. please help
Thank you JohnNov 25, 2009 10:46 PM |
Nov10,20095:18PM
name:CornelRasor
comment: Mr. Grant,
I have been trying to contact either you or Jon but the emails I have are defunct. Things are heating
up in Bonner County
Idaho - I attended your Coordination seminar in Nampa in May and I could use some advice about
some issues we are facing.
Any help would be gratefully appreciated.
Cornel Rasor,
Bonner County Commissioner |
Nov 9, 200911:59PM
name:marylou
comment: Right on Fred! Beautifully written with a balanced view. |
All comments will be posted here and some have asked to have new comments on top so we aim
to please!
Date: Jul 27, 2010 4:46 PM
name: MM
comment: This morning I am compelled to address what seems to be a grand awakening. Now,
in my opinion:
The BP spill was orchestrated by a group of World Order enthusiasts. How can we not look at the
Goldman Sachs sale of most or all their BP stock just three days before the spill. What is it they knew that the rest
of us didn't. Ask: Why are we the American people, with ideas of greatness. not taking a better look at who is
running the government now. Blame the Progressive press for that one. Not only has the government prolonged the oil
spill solution, but they have deliberately caused a major catastrophe with the order to stop drilling. An order that
was completely unnecessary. Jindal couldn't get the permits to build the berms. The booms were moved from
LA to AL; the booms were gathered by LA. The whole event was staged to cause an immediate disaster. This
planned oil rig destruction was a George Soros financed operation. It was designed to further move the people into Cap
and Trade. Why didn't Obama speak to the CEO of BP? Because Obama didn't want to talk " to a man like that".
He waited until the disaster could grow into what it has become.
When Obama can look the American people in the
eye and tell them "the cost of electricity will necessarily skyrocket", and the media does not expose what this bill will
really do, I am no longer surprised. This bill moves the American people closer to the socialist/communistic ideology.
This is who Obama is. He believes in James Hal Cone's Black Theology from the 60's. He sat in Jeremiah
Wrights' Black Theology church for 20 years. Give me a break. Obama was never vetted by the press and so here
we are!
Don't you find it absolutely insulting to the American intelligence that our Congress does not even read the
bills. The people would vomit on the Health bill if they knew how terribly unfair and threatening it is to our
freedom. Take a look at who he appointed, during a congressional recess, to head up this monumental budgetary
spending bill. None other than Donald Bernwick. He is in charge of a 800 million dollar budget and says "Any Healthcare
plan that is just, equitable, civilized and humane, must redistribute the wealth" . He is a huge proponent
of rationing. My, aren't we lucky. All we really had to do was go after the millions and millions in Medicare
and Medicaid fraud. At least that would have been a start. However, that move would not have produced the control
or the power over the American people.
Date: Jul 23, 2010 1:22 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Re.your last section"Thankful For Comments" Nice to see that you still have
a semblance of your Southern Gentleman roots.If you REALLY mean it that you're going to respond within 2 days to your commenters-when
will that start? What about those that came in early July? Don't lose my e-mail address--You've got huge outstanding
I.O.U chits due--as we speak :-):-) Looking forward to a lovely read--but won't be holding a box of bricks overhead until
you get a "roundtuit". How were your readers told about your terrible car accident?Here in Canada,we knew NOTHING about
it. Last we knew, you were delivering a speech in Chicago at a law school April 22-23 and then had some'other travel plans'Thankfully
,you're still very much with us--bright eyed & bushy tailed as ever!!
Date: Jul 18, 2010 11:25 AM
name: fred kelly grant
comment: Haven't replied to comments in awhile, but Donny of Nevada has good points about
BP oil spill. I haven't made up my mind yet, but i have a deeply imbedded suspicion, that is coming toward the surface
more each day, that no one in the federal government or at BP was really interested in stopping the leak quickly. BP's "cap"
that was put on this week was not just created. Its not equivalent to figuring out how to land a man on the moon.
The device could have been built at the beginning, instead of at the 90th day; so why wasn't it? BP, environmental organizations,
the US Navy, Federal Energy all have creative scientists and engineers, so why didn't this relatively simple construction
idea come forward early on (I realize the construction of is intricate, but the idea is not, and the idea is all that would
have been needed to begin construction of it.
What is the purpose of allowing the spill to spoil an entire region of the
sea and of human endeavors and history in the Gulf states? I don't know. Politically, it could have been designed
to show the need for alterntive energy or for cap and trade---but it should have been obvious that the fall out would hurt
the chances for election of those who favor cap an trade, so I don't buy that political theory. What was in it for the
government vis a vis BP Oil? I could believe that it was the US's role in the BP and English deal for oil that gained
the release of the worst terrorist ever convicted and jailed, so that under fake belief that he was dying he could return
to Libya with a hero's welcome. But, what value does it have for BP? Is it all part of a scheme to show that we
need world government, that problems such as oil spills are beyond the capacity of sovereign nations to handle? That
one would not surprise me. BP's directors are intermingled with companies that support world government and elimination
of United States national sovereignty; they are intermingled with the directorships of Goldman Sachs and others of the financial
"giants" that took us down. They are intermingled with the Trilateral Commission, with the Council on Foreign Relations,
with the Bilderberg Group---all of whom favor world government and their control of the world's economy.
So, what think
you? Intentional spill? Intentional delay in stopping?
And why?
Date: Jul 2, 2010 8:23 AM
name: Jeri Elliott
email: muffinsmaven@aol.com
comment: Let's all send an abundance of our VERY best wishes
to F. Grant the Birthday Guy. May he continue for decades, to be as intellectually inspiring as he has always been and
may he be blessed with all that he wishes for himself,day after day --and then some.One million people were born on July 2--That
makes our Fred ONE IN A MILLION!!
Date: Jun 16, 2010 1:32 PM
comment: In response to your June 13 treatment of Obama admin vs BP; this from a friend in NV -
"Some very good
points made however; it misses the true motive behind the inaction taken by the Executive branch. The longer he stalls, the
worse it gets, thereby adding inarguable strength to his and the liberal agenda along with the environmentalists wackos' agenda!
I
am still very skeptical that the explosion was an "accident" due to neglect on safety standards, this was and is perfect timing
for sabotage. Granted, I may be way off base here and I don't rule that out in my mind but I see no other event like it in
oil platform history. Only in vicious storms have oil platforms failed but you never hear it in the media. Yes it was briefly
discussed on the news a while back but was dismissed out of hand as being a ludicrous idea, I believe that is what the Environmentalists
want us to believe. In fact they would never stoop as low as igniting a well and even sacrificing one of their own as well
as those workers' lives to bring their agenda to bear upon the U.S. It is no secret that these wackos absolutely hate the
U.S.A. and anyone who oppose their "eco" crap. It would be divine justice if they were actually made culpable in this oil
disaster to say the least but I'm hoping for the impossible and I'm most probably wrong about it."
Also consider this
article - Barack Obama will use his first-ever prime time Oval Office address tonight to launch the radical greens all-out
assault on our economy.
Using the BP oil spill as a weapon, Obama will seize on widespread public anger to claim passing
Cap and Tax will hold Big Oil accountable.
The oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico has breathed new life into legislation aimed
at putting limits on carbon emissions, with President Obama expected to push Congress to pass a bill that addresses both energy
and global warming in a national address, The Washington Examiner reports this morning.
On Tuesday, hours before Obama
delivers his speech, Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., plan to unveil the Environmental Protection
Agencys economic analysis of their energy and global warming bill, which includes a plan to cap carbon emissions.
Well,
you and I know those numbers will be rigged by the EPA and that Obamas lying. You and I know this is nothing more than
a scheme by radical greens to use huge tax hikes and big government control to finally achieve one of their prime goals
downsizing Americans too big prosperity and taking away basic freedoms.
WTP must step up its efforts to combat this Cap
and Tax attack in the media, in the halls of Congress and in the mailboxes and e-mail inboxes of the American people.
Barack
Obama will use a prime-time national Oval Office address tonight as the launching point of a final assault to pass Cap and
Tax.
Sincerely,
Donny Ferguson
Western Tradition Partnership
National Director of Media and Public Relations
Thanks
for the opportunity to share some comments on this disaster, Kathleen Johnson
Date: Jun 14, 2010 5:22 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: To find the combined talents of an accurate & concise historian AND
an articulate writer in the same person is beyond rare. Fred Kelly Grant is such a one. Thank you for your stunningly simple
yet stunningly passionate documentation of this painfully long standing piece of world history.I have NEVER read it so well
expressed.
Date: Jun 14, 2010 5:46 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Re Fred Grants' article re the shameful/shameless BP travesty... This piece is superior to ANY newspaper
reporting/coverage that has ,to date been written. I wish that it could be sent to the correct officials of the White House,,,
I cannot get enough of Fred G's wise opinions!!
Date: Jun 13, 2010 1:26 PM
name: Jake Norman
comment: Heres Jakes Take:
You know, Fred, theres a pretty simple explanation. The people
elected Obama because they wanted change. The change they got - from one man to another and one party to another - is not
the change they wanted, nor is it the one for which they bargained.
The people thought they were electing a man who
would put them first. They trusted he valued them above big campaign funders and special interests. They thought Obama would
make good on his pledges to them. But hes paralyzed and compromised by the need to compensate and repay his benefactors.
Obama
was and is no more capable of delivering on his promises than was George Bush or any other elected official who takes special
interest campaign donations.
Why? Because arousing public support alone doesn't get you elected even though Obama
certainly had plenty of grassroots supporters. Grassroots isnt generally enough.
It takes serious money to shape public
opinion and get out the vote, especially at the presidential level. Serious money just doesnt come in $25 dollar increments.
And while the peoples gratitude, adoration, and high hopes warm the cockles of a politicians heart, they dont buy much.
To
be elected, most politicians court and seek to please the very special interests the people later demand him to stand up to.
And if a candidate stands on principle and refuses such donations, you can be sure his opponent will quite happily take it.
No,
the change the people sought could not possibly happen. That will only come with a truly independent leader who is willing
to stand with integrity, willing to take a big risk by turning down special interest dollars, and willing to do the right
thing for the people, not the system.
Bottom line? Absent a miracle or some great catastrophe that propels such a leader
into office, until we the people match and exceed campaign donations of special interests, you can just wish in one hand and
spit in the other. It's not happening.
Date: Jun 5, 2010 7:16 PM
name: Glen Grosenbach
comment: Mr. Grant,
You said it all so well!
I could not say
it better or
add to it. May The God of
Creation continue to Bless you and inspire you to keep writing and interacting
on behalf of all the FREEDOMS we enjoy. Sincerely, Glen
Date: Jun 1, 2010 8:27 AM
name: Mark Brohman
Date: May 27, 2010 11:44 AM
name: Carol Souza
comment: Awesome article....
Date: May 26, 2010 9:21 AM
name: Kim Dwyer
comment: People are afraid to to defend their country and stand up for their rights because a
few racial minorities have bullied us into thinking that we must behave in a "politically correct" manner. What is at
stake here? Our entire constitution? The integrity of the US border? The sovereignty of our nation? This
issue must be addressed and not distorted....
Date: May 23, 2010 9:46 AM
name: Carolyn Dearing
comment: Clear headed thinking. What does it say about the United States when so many
of our elected and appointed "leaders" use verbiage like "racist" before even reading what our laws actually say?
Date: May 20, 2010 9:09 PM
name: Tresa Glore
comment: Wonderful article!! How can the general public be so very blind to the manipulations
of a corrupted government! Why do people feel that they have a right to freedom and no responsibility to uphold and
protect that freedom. Well done!
Date: May 20, 2010 3:25 PM
name: Adrian Roy Cockerell
comment: Fred,you are right on the money. What a great piece you have written. Lots
of good facts and a great understanding of the law. Well Done! Thanks
Date: May 20, 2010 9:56 AM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Please refer to the questions asked in the comment section of the "Worth Reading"
site They apply equally to this section/blog. A reply would be most appreciated and ,in fact, appropriate.
Date: May 20, 2010 9:50 AM
name: jeri elliott
comment: You've decided to no longer post the feedback / comments that I've sent in --twice--after
Mar 31st---on the 1st blog site, and 2 days ago on this one. I'm now writing to ask whether Fred is no longer
interested in what readers think---highly unlike him---So then, who chooses/ decides what shows up here?
Date: May 19, 2010 9:26 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Thank you Fred, for writing in a balanced, rational clear way about
one of the most misunderstood and misinterpreted "law" of recent times.I wish that news media---(TV & print) in your country
would copy this blog of yours,verbatim.
Date: May 19, 2010 9:01 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Fred ,what a wonderful way with words you have. The visuals created
by your talented writing skills made this "Remember the time that,,,," so much more interesting to read Thank You.
Date: May 11, 2010 11:07 AM
name: Margaret Earldean Grant
comment: Thank you for the beautiful tribute to "mothers" - thank you for including
me in that tribute! I agree wholeheartedly that we have had some amazingly strong women in our lives to save us from
ourselves and our foibles. Good to hear from you and we'll be doing more of that, I promise!! I love you Fred.
Deani
Date: May 9, 2010 8:34 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: To read Fred Grants blog to day would make every mothers heart sing. And those
of us who are not mothers but, like me,are long term committed fans of Fred Kelly ,have singing hearts also -very relieved
to see that he's well enough to do what he loves and that is writing--which he does so superbly.Welcome Back, Sir G-
Date: Apr 21, 2010 9:09 AM
name: Alice Knapp
comment: We don't remember history very well do we? De Tocqueville
understood our uniqueness,
do we?
Date: Apr 20, 2010 10:49 PM
name: Kathleen Moore
comment: Enjoyed learning more about you and your bide. A very interesting read.
Date: Apr 9, 2010 5:44 AM
name: Ruth A Turner
comment: Thank you for speaking as boldly about Christian faith as you do on other topics
close to you.
Date: Apr 7, 2010 2:34 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: H'ray! FredKellyGrant,the contemporary version of THE (ranchers')SAVIOUR has also finally arisen
(surfaced)this Easter. Welcome back and try to make yourself less scarce.I miss you- I'm sure others do to.
Date: Mar 31, 2010 4:37 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: Fred Grant has not been heard from on this site since March 3rd. This is VERY unusual
and thus, for me,it raises concern about his well being.Reading his contributions was a good way of knowing that all
is well with him. When will we have the pleasure of 'reading Fred'again?
Date: Mar 23, 2010 6:31 PM
name: Marilyn Mancine
comment: I am wondering why at a time of the great takeover of our entire healthcare system,
you have not made a comment. Your readers, including myself, have always looked forward to your take. I would
say that the complete dismanting of the constitution would be right up your alley. What do you think about the sweetness of
the 26 year old remaining on the parent policy, or the all physical conditions accepted by health plans. Seems to me
that is the sure way to break the insurance companies snd force everyone to a pubic option. Where is your comment that
Obama is a socialist and even a marxist. He is a lier and a traitor. Do you think all the Democrats are as stupid
as Bart Stupak? What about the impact of cost and taxes. Didn't Obama tell us we would get the same coverage as
congress----Is it really legal Mr. Grant for the government to force its' citizens to buy health care?
Mar 22, 2010 7:09 PM
name: Vallea Rose
comment: Good Afternoon,
I felt like I needed to fly my flag 1/2 staff or upside down
today after last nights vote. Come November we vote them out Big Deal the damage has been done. I can not find employment
as I am in Land Use and Planning so I am starting up a new business for women who carry firearms.Hopefully I will not be homeless
next year at this time.
Firearms and Illegals... gotta get those votes at all costs.
Great article.
Thanks,
Vallea
Mar 4, 2010 12:14 PM
name: Jeri Elliott
comment: THANK YOU FRED-- As always,it was a pleasure to read your well balanced
,right on point article. It has the same comfortable 'easy chair' tone that makes your book such a continuing
pleasure. Waiting for your next one will not be easy..Fondly, Jeri--A Canadian FredKelly Grant groupie
Mar 3, 2010 3:46 PM
name: Loyd G. Black
comment: Appreciate what you and others like you are doing to preserve our right to keep and bear arms for self-defense.
I
am a member of the NRA and currently involved with helping Daniel Mielke challange Dave Obey in Wisconsin's 7th District.
Dave Obey must go! He has already done enough damage to the Constitution and now will break us as he adds to our unpayable
debt in the trillions.
Feb 9, 2010 9:02 PM
name: Oregon Special
comment: Jon:
I wonder if if would be possible to invert the chronilogical order of the
comment section. I think many would prefer to see the latest comment first rather then continually having to view the
old. Thank you for this consideration.
Feb 6, 2010 11:46 AM
name: Victoria Fleshman
comment: Enjoyed the article - Gotta be a book in there somewhere. There is enough humor
to keep it from getting too dark. Keep it up - Love Ya!
Feb 5, 2010 3:25 PM
name: Anne
comment: Glad to have YOU back writing the blog and that you are back among the living. The Pacific
Ocean beach 50 feet away from my new home will be britening my days as I continue to read your blogs. Want to share ?
Anne
Feb 3, 2010 7:38 AM
name: mohamad reza
comment: helo I am Iranian.
I am a Iranian innovative.
I have inventions very good, but can
not doing in Iran because my country dont support. my inventions very much in different kind, like solar energy and power
station and farming and...
excuse me,I dont know english very good.
Can you help me or can you yuidanse to me?
my
email is (reza_mrm@yahoo.com)
thank you very much
can you help me?
Jan 22, 2010 3:59 AM name:Pharma887
comment: Very nice site! Jan18,20108:22PM name:OregonSpecial
comment: This note is to the January 11th AnneKelly comment regarding global warming.
I am sure that you are now aware of the Gore word change from "global warming" to "climate change".
Climate change is accepted
as a truism. I think you might find the work of Gordon J. Fulks, PhD. quite interesting. You
may be able to clearly see
why the name change took place. My opinion is that Obama's cap and trade will experience some
real oppositon as the facts
indicate a real change took place in climate before there was any carbon dioxide.
I hope you can study this subject further.
Good luck with Dr. Fulks. His work is an eye opener.Jan 14,
2010 11:27 AMname:Joe Poore comment:
I am not sure if I always understand what you write about but this
one I get, the government finds a way to screw you from the time your born and eveb after you die!
keep up the good work!
Jan 11, 2010 11:20 PM name:AnneKelly
comment: If Global Warming is caused by the increase of carbon footprints left by an expansive
population growth, and if the
carbon footprints are not controlled globally in the very near future, then our planet as we know
it will not survive.
If this is a true fact then would someone who truly understands and thus is able to articulate
the causes and effects of global
warming in the 21st Century, please explain to me how this phenomenon, i.e. global warming, differs
from the natural occurrence
of global warming during the end of the Pleistocene glacial period.
Or am I being too simplitic?
Jan 4, 2010 3:45PM name: K.A. Holden
comment: Nice. Trying to reach Fred Kelly. Have him get in touch
Jan4,20103:39PM name:Lassie
comment: You need to correct the date from 2090 to 2009 in paragraph 2 line 2.
Jan 2, 2010 8:20 PM name:MarilynMancine
comment: Fred:
I just do not think you are looking at reality this time.By the time your conservative leader emerges,
the country will be
lost.The land you now attempt to protect is fast diminishing.Just look at the new Clear Water Act.The
new health care program
will take our lives let alone our privacy.Too bad you and myself are not privy to the "whole" health
care bill.Our senators
are being bought, and I think some of the administration could be tried for treason. The economy
is heading for super inflation;
the dollar will be worthless and Obama wants to be the ruler of some "One World Order". Give me
a break Fred.
Jan 2, 2010 11:38 AM name:MickMizner
comment: The trueth will always withstand the test of time!
Thank you to Judge Moore for his clarity!
Jan 2, 2010 11:29 AM name:MickMizner
comment: Thanks Fred for and ideal perspective! We have work to do!
Jan 2, 2010 6:06 AM name:AnneKelly
comment: Hopefully thsi computer will get this message through.
I nominate Minnesota Vikingss' Alan Page, DT, 9 times Pro Bowl and Carl Eller, DE, 6 times Pro
Bowl and both at Canton.
Jan 2, 2010 5:56 AM name:AnneKelly
comment: What about Fran Tarkenton of the Minnesota Vikings?
Jan 1, 2010 1:25 AM name:Sally
comment: Yea!! I'm from Wisconsin and have watched those Packers play in a blizzard and minus zero
temp. Miss Lombardi.
Now Seattle is a great place to be but miss those old days.
Dec 29, 2009 6:00 PM name: Barbara Craven
comment: What time is your book signing January 2? Thanks, Barbara
Dec 21, 2009 1:41 PM name: Gary Arthur
DeMott
comment: NHS"Bulldog"...Time to have a cup of coffee..BHS"Brave"ie, There is relief for your excerdin
headache!!!
Dec 7, 2009 12:00 AM
name:alexk921
comment: Very nice site! |
Dec 3, 2009 8:27 AM
name:NicholasTestaccio
comment: Our movement is essentially a movement without teeth.
I have seen too many cheerleaders, and far too many abuses continued to our supposed enlightenment.
For one, there are too many people who live on the public coffers. That includes welfare, government
agencies, and a whole
lot of un-constitutional law enforcement agents. The legal profession from the courts to the traffic
lawyer are corrupt beyond
belief.
You all ready know this. Unfortunately the vast majority don't know that when they serve on a jury
they must be the ones who
act according to the rule of law because the judge and prosecutor most certainly will not.We must
understand that the sheriff
must be made to do the will of the people and not the courts, or unconstitutional acts. |
Nov 25, 2009 10:46 PM
name:Russ McAfee
Comment: Great Site! |
Nov 11, 2009 11:56 AM
name:John-Paul:
comment: I have a judge that has stated in the court room asking the opossing attorney to meet
him in chambers twice to write
and order, the last time 3 were typed and one hand writen. The hand writen was in responce to
a document that I gave to
the court clerk when the judge was on the bench before they went to his chambers. please help
Thank you JohnNov 25, 2009 10:46 PM |
Nov10,20095:18PM
name:CornelRasor
comment: Mr. Grant,
I have been trying to contact either you or Jon but the emails I have are defunct. Things are heating
up in Bonner County
Idaho - I attended your Coordination seminar in Nampa in May and I could use some advice about
some issues we are facing.
Any help would be gratefully appreciated.
Cornel Rasor,
Bonner County Commissioner |
Nov 9, 200911:59PM
name:marylou
comment: Right on Fred! Beautifully written with a balanced view. |
|
