In
the cab from the Portland airport to the hotel, I rode with a former resident of Iraq.He was a Kurd from Northern Iraq.He told me that the Kurds have had to
fight for their freedom since 1918 when they were forced into an Iraqi state with their dreaded enemies, the Sunnis from Central
Iraq.He told me that a third of Kurds – the elder generation - could not read
or write.They followed the tribal leaders and religious leaders who read and
interpreted for them.Government was local, by tribes and religious groups.Their interests were completely different from the Sunnis and Shiites and they wanted
no union with them.So, one state of war existed from 1918 right on until George
Bush tried to impose American “democracy” on the peoples of the three regions of Iraq and join them into one nation state
with our constitution.“What good is a constitution when a third of the Kurds
cannot read?” asked my Kurdish driver.“What good is a constitution when we Kurds
know the Sunnis will never accept us as equals?” he added.“How can three peoples
of different religions live together under a constitution not based on religion?”
The driver’s opinion was that there should
be three distinct states in Iraq – not American imposed “democracy”, which the people of Iraq do not understand or want.He, as a recent resident who has seen the ravages of war, sees the Bush legacy as
one of destruction of an ancient people’s religion and tribal heritage – just as most in America thought.Much as Sir Winston Churchill thought when before his death he said his biggest regret was his support
of an Iraqi state in 1918 after World War I.Granted Bush wouldn’t have known
the history of Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites, but surely to God some of his “experts” should have.
My driver said that most of his relatives
and friends in Iraq believed that Chaney was the moving force behind the war and that the war really didn’t have anything
to do with democracy, but with oil.
Kurds in particular despised Chaney because his wanting war thrust on them even more severe loss
of their freedom.He said the Kurds, like most Iraqis wanted freedom, not democracy.
Fred is in Washington D.C. to witness the Public Lands bill being signed by President Obama, it is a great honor to be
invited and will make for an awesome article for us to print. I am sure it will be up tomorrow.
The following comment by Andy Grant is on the mar 28 article about Ryan Moats being detained while a family member died
in the hospital.
comment: I respect the people who work in law enforcement. For the most part, they do work
hard in a dangerous field to keep my family safe in a day when criminals have no fears about pulling a weapon on a police
officer. However, this particular officer seems to have had several questionable arrests over the 3 years he's been
on the force. He even starts the damn lecture again after finally writing out the ticket to Moats. "Attitude is
everything" he repeats over and over, while telling Moats to "shut his mouth" and restating the fact that he could arest him
for running the red light. I bet the more seasoned officers in this Dallas police department have a pool going on which
silly arrest situation this young stud is going to bring in next. Heed you own advice young Skywalker, "shut your mouth"
and "attitude is everything".
This will be short but my brother Andy found this video and sent it to post on Justice My Ass! It seems another police
officer used his "authority" to not help but hinder the people they are supposed "to serve and protect" I'm sure thats what
I read on their door when they drive by.
My good friend and associate, Ted Howard, sent the following internet message to me by email, and I think it fits all
of us here at Justice My Ass. As you recall, we started this blog off with two articles about how the liberal cause
had taken over the First Amendment to the detriment of all those who believe that we have as much right to mention religion
as the ultra-liberal seculists do to ignore religion. That First Amendment gives us the right to be free of obstruction
to our religious beliefs, just as strongly as it gives the right to be free of a government dictated religion.
The liberal secular arm of the United States Supreme Court has used that separation of church and state, which we believe
in FIRMLY AND STRONGLY, to take away the unobstructed rights also provided for in the amendment. With that in mind,
as the following message says, pay special attention to the Jay Leno quote at the end. Thanks, Ted, for the forward.
READ TO THE BOTTOM FOR QUOTE OF THE MONTH BY JAY LENO. IF YOU DON'T READ ANYTHING ELSE---VERY
WELL STATED TO ALL THE KIDS WHO SURVIVED the 1930's, 40's, 50's, 60's and 70's!!
First, we survived being born to mothers who smoked and/or drank while they
were pregnant.
They took aspirin, ate blue cheese dressing, tuna from a
can, and didn't get tested for diabetes.
Then after that trauma, we were put to sleep on our tummies
in baby cribs covered with bright colored lead-based paints.
We had no childproof lids on
medicine bottles, doors or cabinets and when we rode our bikes, we had no helmets, not to mention, the risks we took hitchhiking.
As infants & children, we would ride in cars with no
car seats, booster seats, seat belts or air bags.
Riding in the back of a pick up on a warm day was always
a special treat.
We drank water from the garden hose and NOT from a bottle.
We shared one soft drink with four friends, from one bottle
and NO ONE actually died from this.
We ate cupcakes, white bread and real butter and drank Kool-aid made with sugar, but we were not overweight because, WE WERE ALWAYS OUTSIDE PLAYING!
We would leave home in the morning and play all day, as
long as we were back when the streetlights came on.
No one was able to reach us all day. And we were O.K.
We would spend hours building our go-carts out of scraps
and then ride down the hill, only to find out we forgot the brakes. After running into the bushes a few times, we learned
to solve the problem.
We did not have Play Stations, Nintendo's, X-boxes, no video
games at all, no 150 channels on cable, no video movies or DVD's, no surround-sound or CD's, no cell phones, no personal computers,
no internet or chat rooms.......
WE HAD FRIENDS and we went outside and found them!
We fell out of trees, got cut, broke bones and teeth and
there were no lawsuits from these accidents.
We ate worms and mud pies made from dirt, and the worms did not live in us
forever.
We were given BB guns for our 10th birthdays, made up games
with sticks and tennis balls and, although we were told it would happen, we did not put out very many eyes.
We rode bikes or walked to a friend's house and knocked
on the door or rang the bell, or just walked in and talked to them!
Little League had tryouts and not everyone made the team.
Those who didn't had to learn to deal with disappointment. Imagine that!!
The idea of a parent bailing us out if we broke the law
was unheard of. They actually sided with the law!
These generations have produced some of the best risk-takers,
problem solvers and inventors ever!
The past 50 years have been an explosion of innovation and
new ideas. We had freedom, failure, success and responsibility, and we learned HOW TO DEAL WITH IT ALL!
If YOU are one of them...CONGRATULATIONS!
You might want to share this with others who have had the
luck to grow up as kids, before the lawyers and the government regulated so much of our lives for our own good...
While you are at it, forward it to your kids so they will
know how brave (and lucky) their/our parents were.
The quote of the month is by Jay Leno:
"With hurricanes, tornados,
fires out of control, mud slides, flooding, severe thunderstorms tearing up the country from one end to another, and with
the threat of bird flu and terrorist attacks, are we sure this is a good time to take God out of the Pledge of Allegiance?"
Karl Drenninger writes with a sound understanding
of the market forces which are at play in this country today.He challenges the
Federal Reserve on a regular basis.We will undertake in the next few weeks to
explain to all how the Federal Reserve operates; how it is not a United States Government agency, yet dictates economic policy
for the government of the U.S., with its director often treating the Congressional committees as underlings, subject to his
direction.
the following by Karl Denninger:
Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner plans to propose today a sweeping expansion of federal authority over
the financial system, breaking from an era in which the government stood back from financial markets and allowed participants
to decide how much risk to take in the pursuit of profit.
The Obama administration's plan, described by several sources, would extend federal regulation for the first
time to all trading in financial derivatives and to companies including large hedge funds and major insurers such as American International Group. The administration also will seek to impose uniform standards on all large
financial firms, including banks, an unprecedented step that would place significant limits on the scope and risk of their
activities.
In general I agree with the top-level sentiment.
Let's tick off the things that I can find common ground with:
Penalizing large firms in the form of forcing them to hold more capital against their assets as compensation
for their systemic risk (I like it as one of the better ways to force those who put risk on society to bear the cost of it.)
Force large firms to constantly update their positions vis-a-vis risk exposure (instead of quarterly as
is done now); I like it.
Seizure authority for such "large and systemically important firm"; check. If you can blow up the
world we have to be able to stop you.
Registration of hedge funds. Maybe. Let's see where that one goes.
Standards for money-market funds. Absolutely; concentration risk is a big problem
and while I don't want to prohibit it, much more forthright disclosure is required for "ordinary" money market funds.
Most people think these funds will essentially never lose money. That's not necessarily the case.
Forcing derivatives (including OTC CDS) onto central-counterparty exchanges. IT IS ABOUT DAMN
TIME!
And where we differ:
The Fed would have primary recommendation authority for a takeover/seizure. No. The Fed should
not be involved in a pass/no pass role, as it is not accountable to the taxpayer. The primary regulator and FDIC, which
bears the costs of failures (and thus has an incentive to avoid them) yes. The Fed, no.
There is no insistence on closing the "dark pools" and other OTC markets. Sorry guys, if you want the
privilege of public market access and the privilege of public guarantees for clearing and settlement, you should
have to perform your trading in the light of day.
There is no call for re-imposition of Glass-Steagall. This has to happen folks. Bluntly,
depository and lending functions need to be treated as utilities. I know a lot of people would disagree, but this is
how I see it, because it is the corruption of these functions that led to this mess being "systemically important."
Finally, there is the question of "who" handles this function. It absolutely must not be The
Fed, as The Fed is neither accountable or impartial. The FDIC is probably the most reasonable place within our current
infrastructure of regulators to place this with, despite its warts and errors (e.g. not seizing IndyMac when it should have.)
Overall though there is much to like here and not much to hate, and with a few more additions I'd be
enthusiastically behind it.
You can expect the banking industry to scream bloody murder on CDS regulation. The reason is simple
- this has been an absolute gold mine for them due to the intentional price obfuscation that OTC trading provides. That
is, by keeping the bids and offers "to themselves" they can rob the buyers and sellers via a grossly-wide spread, pocketing
the difference. Central-counterparty exchange listing will inherently narrow those spreads dramatically and this means
much less income from the trading of these vehicles (as opposed to unhedged speculating, which I argue banks should
not be engaged in anyway!)
America is on fire and it is out of control. It is a fire of populist anger that left unchecked will likely
rage throughout this year and into the election year of 2010.
Unlike the wildfires we have every year here in California and throughout the West, it is not consuming acres of forest
and people’s homes — unless you count the huge drop in home values. It is consuming America’s trust and confidence in the
very institutions that we count on to guide this nation.
Politicians of both parties are trying feverishly to contain this fire. It is burning in many locations and just like a
wildfire it is threatening to grow into one big conflagration that will destroy all before it.
If all these fires now raging across America ever combine together into one huge populist
inferno, there won’t be an incumbent politician standing—just ashes.
Hell, I know why they’re doing it. They are deathly afraid that it will also consume the thing the value most — their careers.
And let’s face it. This is about playing for political advantage for the coming battles over the Obama agenda and saving one’s
own hide.
The people are angry about bonuses and bailouts being paid for with their money. So am I. But I am equally as angry at
the numbskulls in Congress who act as mere bystanders or worse, as this fiscal house of cards collapses all around them. Barney
Frank wants to make public the list of those who got bonuses from AIG, no doubt so that the media can camp out in front of
their homes and harass these folks for days taking their eye off who is really responsible — Congress.
Just the other day Connecticut Democrat Senator Chris Dodd said, “The public confidence in our
ability is being adversely affected — not just mildly, but seriously.” What a great grasp of the obvious Senator. Now you
can go home.
Their plan for fighting the blazes amounts to lighting backfires which are meant to consume the fuel in the fire’s path
and slow it down so it eventually burns itself out for lack of nourishment. The fuel in this case is voter anger. But any
experienced wildfire firefighter will tell you that lighting backfires is very tricky and rarely done because if the wind
or other conditions change quickly, instead of controlling the fire you could make it worse.
Our fearless leaders desperately want to change the subject and in a rare bipartisan frenzy are tripping over themselves
to get in front and lead the mob. AIG and any other company that received TARP funds are be hauled from the court of public
opinion, dragged to the media public square and executed in the tax guillotine. That’s their idea of a backfire.
And it’s not just AIG bonuses or the smorgasbord of bailouts being served at the Treasury Department cafeteria. Years of
profligate spending at all levels of government and pie-in the-sky political promises to get elected, have finally come home
to roost.
In every state, every city, every county and every village, hamlet and town politicians are scrambling to fill empty coffers
by raising taxes on anything and everything.
• Illinois plans a 50% increase in both personal and corporate taxes
• Hoboken New Jersey wants to raise property taxes 47%.
• Massachusetts is planning an increase of 19 cents a gallon gas tax
And here in California we are being asked to go to the polls on May 19 and agree to tax and borrow ourselves into oblivion
because the politicians have failed miserably to do their jobs. Sound familiar?
Keystone Kops fiscal planning in Washington, state and local governments plans to tax anything they can, loss of
assets earned over a lifetime and a home that is probably worth less today than it was when it was bought are all contributing
to this anger and mob mentality.
But if either political party or President Obama think they can light the backfire and incite the mob and then somehow
direct its anger into a political advantage they are even more out of touch with the American people than I thought.
And if all these fires now raging across America ever combine together into one huge populist inferno, there won’t be an
incumbent politician standing—just ashes.
Bloggers note: Here are a few old movie clips on today’s themes. The first is the great speech by Broderick Crawford as
Willie Stark in “All The King’s Men”. If we ever got one of these — look out America!
The second is from John Ford’s classic “Young Mr. Lincoln” starring Henry Fonda. If President Obama really wanted to emulate
Lincoln he might try this movie version approach to dealing with the mob. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cni1B6g1_1M&feature=related
INVESTIGATIVE DETAILS SHOW THAT THE PAROLEE WHO DIDN’T
THINK HE WAS “TREATED RIGHT” STOOD OVER DOWNED OFFICERS AND FIRED AT THEM AGAIN----ASSURING THAT HE HAD MURDERED THEM
We heard from an uncle of the murderer in Oakland that
the parolee was “frustrated” because he wasn’t “treated right” by the system.He
had been stood up by a parole officer, and he hadn’t been able to find a job, so he was “frustrated”.So, he armed himself with a handgun and an assault weapon, obviously to prevent being sent back to prison.He knew he was going back because he had deliberately missed his February appointment
with his parole officer.
Now, it is known that after he shot the officers who stopped
him in traffic, he walked back to their bodies and shot again.
Oakland police sergeant Mark Dunakin, a motorcycle officer,
stopped Lovelle Mixon on Saturday in a traffic stop.At some point after the
stop, Dunakin was joined by motorcycle officer John Hege.Dunakin asked Mixon
for his license to run a check.The photo on the license was that of Mixon, but
the license number was assigned to a different person.(The “frustrated” Mixon
must have spent some time in forging a license, time which could have been spent perhaps in at least menial work)As the sergeant was returning to the motorcycle to run the check, Mixon stepped out of the car and
began firing a semi automatic handgun, hitting both Dunakin and Hege.
Passersby told officers that neither Dunakin nor Hege had
the opportunity to radio for help or even draw their own weapons.As they lay
on the ground, Mixon walked back to them and fired down at them, and then fled with his weapon.
Where did he go?To an apartment around the corner inhabited by family members.SWAT officers
were hindered in their response because it was a difficult building to evacuate without subjecting emerging residents to gunfire.SWAT officers were not sure what observation point Mixon had, so had to be extremely
careful in not subjecting neighborhood residents from gunfire.So, they had to
rush the apartment itself instead of isolating the entire building.As they entered
the apartment, Mixon was lying down in a bedroom closet, with door closed, and he started firing through the door and struck
the SWAT officers who were killed.His 16 year old sister was in the apartment
and was not hurt by the ensuing gunfire.
As pointed out by experts outside Oakland who are reviewing
the police operation, Mixon was intent on killing officers.
And, more details come forth about this “frustrated” parolee
who thought he was not being “treated right” by the system.He first went to
prison for a car-jacking in San Francisco during which he fired a weapon.He
got a whale of a sentence for that offense----six long years.Some judge really
threw the book at this guy who already, before age 20, showed he had no value for human life.But, the California system of “justice” didn’t even make him serve the whole 6---he was paroled after five.
Within a few months, he was investigated in a murder, in
which he was the only suspect.The sister ofthe murdered man swears that she knows an eyewitness who just refused to come forward.The police could not find evidence sufficient to persuade the DA to file charges, but Mixon went back to prison for
FIVE, count them, FIVE parole violations committed within three months.
This time he served 9 whole months and was released in
November, 2008.And, now DNA from the dead Mixon, shows that he is likely the
rapist of a twelve year old girl this past February near the apartment in which he murdered the officers last Saturday.
Why was this man on parole?California Attorney General Jerry Brown says that the parole system is broken.He has announced that he will conduct an investigation into how the murderer was monitored after his release.My oh my, another government “investigation”, another committee no doubt, or investigative
commission.Don’t you tire of “investigations” and “commissions”, don’t you wish
that just once politicians would take action, instead of studying.
The tragic part of all this is that the news and the horror
will fade into the background, and in a month, no one will remember the outrage except the loved ones of the murdered officers.Californians will go about their business, and will not pay any more attention to
the broken parole system, until another officer is killed, another twelve year old girl is raped, another citizen is robbed
and killed by a parolee who should still be in prison.
Apathy will again prevail.Why?Maybe because individual citizens truly believe there is nothing
they can do.But, there is.Look
to organizations to help.Look to the internet and find organizations that are
interested in private and personal civil rights.Citizens, your civil rights
are violated, even under the Civil Rights Act, if you are not protected from violent criminals who prey innocents on the street.
It should appall Californians that a parolee “frustrated”
by the system in not being able to find a job, could rape a twelve year old girl, buy or steal automatic weapons and deliberately
decide that he would murder to stay out of prison.He really was spending time
looking for a job wasn’t he?
PAROLE SYSTEM IN CALIFORNIA FAILED THE MURDERED POLICE OFFICERS IN OAKLAND AND FAIL ALL INNOCENT
AND HONEST CALIFORNIANS.AMERICANS SHOULD BEGIN TODAY TO CHANGE THEIR GOVERNMENT
BY FORCING POLITICIANS TO ACT RESPONSIBLY OR TAKE THEIR SEAT ON THE BENCH
--- by Fred Kelly GrantMarch 23, 2009
The murders of Oakland police officers makes it clear that the “criminal justice system” has failed innocent people
woefully.California Attorney General Jerry Brown pointed out how the system
is failing.But, it has been failing for some time, and national studies have
proved that, and have warned about the dangers of the failure.So, where has
General Brown and California’s termigovernor and legislature been?As the Oakland
Tribune writers point out, the problem has been building for years, so can’t be laid at the feet of the current office holders.But, they are wrong in the last part of their analysis.The problem may have been brewing for years, but current office holders should have been tryingto solve it.
In Alameda County, in which the Oakland officers were murdered,there
were 7,000 parolees released just last year alone.If all those parolees follow
state-wide patterns, 66 percent of them will return to prison.How long has this
failure of the system been evident?
A National Institute of Justice report last year said that:“California’s
parole population is now so large and its parole agents are so overburdened that parolees who represent a serious public safety
threat are not watched closely.”
The Oakland Tribune reports that:“But reports investigating the state’s
parolee system have been sending for the past decade cautionary tales about the dangers posed by an ever-increasing parolee
population.But little, if anything, has been done to change a system that sees
more parolees return to prison than any other state.”
The Tribune points out that one of the failures of the system is the knee-jerk reactions of the California legislators
always plying for votes, without thought as to real effective action.The determinate
sentencing statute passed by the legislature as a reaction to whatever some crisis was in 1976.The statute mandates that a prisoner be released on parole after serving a certain number of years, regardless
of whether he is still a danger and regardless of his conduct in prison.So,
the statute not only works against prison guards because there is no incentive for good behavior, it works against the parole
system because the Board has no discretion to keep an obviously violent criminal in prison.
The Institute of Justice report states:“Because California releases nearly
all prisoners…the state’s parole agents end up supervising some individuals who pose a far more serious threat to society
than the typical parolee.”“In states that use discretionary release, these
high-risk prisoners can be denied parole and kept in prison.”
Reports like the Institute report are compiled over a period of years, so the warning to California’s legislators and
administrators has been evident for years.As the little Hoover Commission reported
in 2007, “Years of political posturing have taken a good idea---determinate sentencing---and warped it beyond recognition
with a series of laws passed with no thought to their cumulative impact”
The Report pointed out that “Despite ample evidence and
recommendations, policymakers have been unwilling to take on the problem in a purposeful, constructive way”
Now, four Oakland officers, trying to enforce the laws to keep the public safe, are dead, needlessly.They leave behind them families and friends who mourn.And,
the politicians will all make statements of condolence and statements about how the parole system must be revamped----and
then the legislators will go back to reach gridlock on budgets, and the administrators will go back to protecting their clerical
bureaucratic budgets at the expense of public safety and education.
But, the real problem—the real essence of the tragedy here---is that the masses of honest, voting citizens will return
to apathy, and will not demand en masse that their officials act responsibly or take themselves outside the public employ.
Perhaps because they don’t know what to do about it, citizens will continue to allow themselves to be victimized by
the so-called criminal justice system.
In the 1760s Americans finally had enough of English politicians---Thomas Jefferson said that it was healthy to have
an occasional revolution.Now, we aren’t advocating a military revolution as
was needed in 1776----but a political revolution as was also needed in 1776.
Individuals can join together in civil revolution to revise our government,and 2009 is the time to begin.Join efforts like those of Stewards of the Range (see www.stewards.us) ,the Goldwater Institute’s efforts to revise government in Arizona (see Goldwater Institute in search), Americans for
Prosperity (see Americans for Prosperity in search, nationally and by state), Freedom 21 (see Freedom 21 in search) and all
the local government coordination efforts and private property efforts identified at www.stewards.us and from time to time here.It is time to begin.You can’t wait any longer.Instead of
spending time bemoaning the national political morasse, turn to doing something about the problems at your local level---where
your voice can be heard, and your vote counted.
THE TOURNAMENT MOVES ON----LEAVING BEHIND SOME HIGHLY RANKED
TEAMS AND SOME TEAMS THAT FORGOT IT WAS GAME TIME
I looked forward all week to my Maryland Terrapins being able to move ahead and prove that the late season burst they
put on was not just temporary.I wanted that little guard Vasquez to get to show
his wares to a major United States public for weeks more.He is such a great
fighter and shooter.
Well, the Terps forgot that they were
supposed to play on Saturday, and didn’t show up for the game. But, rather than
just forfeit the game,the NCAA required the team to play, so Memphis had a practice
scrimmage, played like they meant business, and sent the Terps home for the off-season.
In all fairness, I believe now that
Memphis proved itself to me to be a real team, a legitimate challenger for the national championship.When they played so laidback against Cal State Northridge,
I questioned their credentials.But, coach Calipari even took the blame for their
early showing---saying that it woke him up to the fact that these players had not been here before, that the entire drama
and certainty of the one loss tournament required a different mind set.He said
that he simply berated his team during the first part of the Northridge game because he thought they were just being lazy.Then, he realized at half time that they were responding to the hype.When he realized that, he got his players ready, and Maryland was the victim of their now being ready.
What a lesson in life Calipari’s statement
provides:we all need to prepare for each day of our lives by assessing our place,
the situation facing us, and how we need to adjust to that ever changing situation.
Another lesson in life came from the day’s results.Preparation is critical---mental
and physical preparation.As we go into each day, we should be prepared for the
issues we know about, and prepared to be steely enough to adjust to issues we may not know about---prepared mentally, and
prepared physically so that we can sustain the mental effort to overcome the issues.
Each game yesterday proved how important that is.These should have been
very close, hotly competed games---these were the games where the lower seeds for the most part had been eliminated.These were now the 32 elite teams in all the nation.Yet, we saw a series of blow-outs----teams that were not prepared to meet even the clear game plans of their opponents,
much less their adjustments.Example was the LSU v. North Carolina game.After watching the Maryland-North Carolina game, and the North Carolina game in the
ACC tournament, it was clear to me that any team had to beat NC in the first half of the second half of the game.LSU was prepared mentally for that fact, their coach had done a good job, and the Tigers came out ready
in the second half and made a big run, reducing the NC lead as they must.But,
physically, they seemed to tire, and physical exhaustion can cause a mental break.They
made the big run, but couldn’t get a big lead which they then could hold during the final ten minutes.And, by the ten minute mark, North Carolina, prepared as all Roy Williams teams are, had held the line,
and then breezed to victory.
I’m off today to the Boise State University Pavilion to watch Xavier take on upstart Wisconsin, and I can’t tell you
right now that I don’t believe that Wisconsin, a well steeled team with precision discipline, will pull the upset.Marquette, the premier team once a champion under Al McGuire, is a class team, but whether they can
knock off Missouri I don’t know.AllI
hope for is close games.
As watching these games, my eyes will be on my other team left, the USC Trojans.Texas is gone, although putting up a great effort against Duke—a team always prepared.And, I will be watching Cleveland State to see whether they can continue the miracle commenced when they beat one of
the fine teams in the United States, Wake Forest.
My brief, but spirited, break from all the problems of work, is about over.Friday,
with family and friends I enjoyed the four games of the first round.Yesterday,
I enjoyed the second round with a friend, discussed sports and life in general last night with a great friend, and now our
second round in Boise.Then, tomorrow, probably even tonight, the magic of the
tournament fades and its back to work.Sad, as the end of Autumn with the bitter
wind of Winter is sad----but, in all our lives, there must be a new start, and as I go back to work, I think that next year
the first and second rounds are in Spokane---just a few hours away by auto----and I think of all the new and exciting possibilities
that can make the ensuing twelve months interesting.
MARCH 21 WAS THE
STARTING DAY FOR ONE OF THE MOST MOMENTOUS SOCIAL CHANGING IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES.
On this day in 1965 a freedom walk from Selma, Alabama to Montgomery Alabama began.It was a march of thousands led by Dr. Martin Luther King in support of passage of the Voting Rights Act.The march followed earlier attempts during March, 1965 to gain attention to the plight of Afro Americans
in the southern United States.Those earlier attempts had resulted in violence
on the part of Alabama police officers and citizens---violence demonstrated by beatings with baseball bats, sticks, clubs,
and any object which could do physical damage to a human being.The violence
had brought into the national prominence the name of Bull Connors, police commissioner of Birmingham, Alabama, who ordered
high pressure fire hoses turned on men, women and children to force them out of demonstrations.He ordered police dogs on to the demonstrators, and the entire world saw photos of snarling animals lunging
at children.
Afro Americans were murdered.A nation was stunned.Decent Southerners mourned over the stigma attached to their region.Afro Americans remained committed, under the leadership of Dr. King.
Thus started the march---a march to history making change----but
regrettably, to the assassination of Dr. King just three years later in Memphis, Tennessee.
Tomorrow, we begin a three part series on the historic month of March, 1965.
We are heading to the NCAA tournamant so in honor of the greatest sporting event, here are some great sport quotes:
Great coaches win games when it counts. Some coaches also make great interviews for the media writers by never shying away
in victory or defeat, and giving great quotes. Even fewer have great personalities to go with their victories, and quotes
that are insightful, memorable and sometimes so funny we cannot help but smile.
And then there are the select few, legends in their own time that will never be forgotten, such as Knute Rockne and Vince
Lombardi. Add Lou Holtz to the same list, not in the same class as Rockne and Lombardi, but because of his quick wit and quality
comments. Successful coaches did not become so by being stupid, arcane and bovine. Holtz is sharp as a tack.
Rockne (the Notre Dame Fighting Irish), Lombardi (the Green Bay Packers), and Holtz (the only coach to lead 6 college programs
to bowl-game appearances) are all football coaches.
Enter basketball's John Wooden, who ranks in the same class as Rockne and Lombardi.
Known as the "Wizard of Westwood", Wooden won 665 games in 27 seasons at UCLA and 10 NCAA titles during this last 12 years,
including 7 straight from 1967 to 1973. He also had an 88-game winning streak and two undefeated, back-to-back national championship
teams.
Wooden's UCLA record during his 10 National Championship years was 291-10 (not a misprint); it rounds to a 97% winning
percentage and includes no less than 4 perfect 30-0 seasons.
Here are some of John Wooden's most famous quotes:
"If you don't have time to do it right, when will you have time to do it over?"
"Never mistake activity for achievement."
"If you're not making mistakes, then you're not doing anything. I'm positive that a doer makes mistakes."
"Adversity is the state in which man most easily becomes acquainted with himself, being especially free of admirers then."
"Failure is not fatal, but failure to change might be."
"I'd rather have a lot of talent and a little experience than a lot of experience and a little talent."
"Do not let what you cannot do interfere with what you can do."
"Talent is God-given. Be humble. Fame is man-given. Be grateful. Conceit is self-given. Be careful."
"Ability is a poor man's wealth."
"Winning takes talent, to repeat takes character."
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your
reputation is merely what others think you are."
"Things turn out best for the people who make the best of the way things turn out."
"You can't let praise or criticism get to you. It's a weakness to get caught up in either one."
Most of the criticism leveled at the recent Omnibus Spending Bill was about the 8,000 pork barrel projects it contained.
Oddly enough, some of the folks complaining the loudest had their snouts deepest in the trough. What was mostly lost in all
the “your projects pork but mine is necessary to the survival of the nation” between Republicans and Democrats was the death
warrant issued for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program inserted by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill).
This program has been a lifeline to a better life for those kids who were lucky enough to participate. It gave school vouchers
of $7500 to 1,700 kids so that they could attend schools of their choice. Every year since it was established in 2004, there
have been four times as many kids applying as there were spaces. Many have attended Catholic schools and although the tuition
and associated fees of these schools were higher than the voucher, the Archdiocese of Washington ate the difference.
Forgetting the disingenuous language about helping kids “but this isn’t the way” you constantly hear from Democrats and
school choice opponents, Durbin’s sole purpose was to eliminate the successful school voucher program at the behest of his
patrons in the teachers unions. After all campaign contributions and foot soldiers are more important than 1,700 kids.
I am not going to try to argue the pros or cons of school choice. I am no expert on education, as I am sure many of the
folks who comment on this article will point out to me. Others might say that the program and others like it have not been
proven and that it needs more study. And those who support the unions will no doubt say that this will cripple the public
schools in America. From the educational products I have seen being produced by the public schools here in California, they
are already crippled.
I do want to relate to you an experience I had last year with some students from a charter school in Sacramento. I think
it illustrates what is possible.
In 1989, almost 20 years before he ran for mayor of Sacramento, former NBA star Kevin Johnson founded St. Hope Academy.
According to its Web site, “St. HOPE is a nonprofit community development corporation whose mission is to revitalize inner-city
communities through public education, civic leadership, economic development and the arts. “
Kevin had grown up in Oak Park, one of the toughest neighborhoods in Sacramento. And unlike other sports stars who pay
lip service to helping the community, Kevin put not only his money but his heart into the mission of changing the circumstances
of his old neighborhood that so many inner city kids must deal with every day.
In 2003, St. HOPE established an independent network of charter schools. Its mission statement is clear and direct, just
like Kevin.
Mission: To graduate self-motivated, industrious, and critically thinking leaders who are passionate about life-long
learning and committed to serving others.
In 2003, St. HOPE took up one of its biggest challenges.
Sacramento High was in deep trouble and it was in danger of being closed with the students shuffled off to other schools
in the District. Kevin fought with all his might to have St. HOPE take over the school and run it as a charter school. You
could have heard the hollerin’ from the teachers unions and their allies about this move from San Francisco to the Sierras.
Despite all their opposition Kevin and the parents who supported him triumphed. Ever since the defenders of the horrible
status quo have tried to do everything they could to derail this effort. Funny, you would think they would be more concerned
about the welfare and education of the kids rather than their narrow political agenda? Don’t bet on it. To them the kids are
just pawns in the bigger game of politics.
Is the program at Sac High working? I think so. I had lunch with three soon-to-be graduates last fall. It was at a campaign
event for Mayor Johnson, I was seated at a table with three Sac High seniors. They sat straight up in their chairs and their
manners were impeccable. A lot of spoiled suburban kids could learn much from these three. After I sat down they each introduced
themselves to me. There was some small talk and I then inquired about what year in school they were. They all replied they
were seniors.
When I asked about their plans for next year they all had short answers. “I am going to UC Davis”, said the first, “Cal
Poly”, said the second and the third said “I will be attending Howard University in Washington D.C.”. I was pleasantly stunned.
As I walked back to my office, I thought, all things are possible if we put our minds to it. All these kids needed was
a chance and someone to believe in them. And I believe that those three students will have a “multiplier effect” that can
help change a generation.
We cannot continue to condemn America’s children to dead-end schools that produce kids who will have dead-end jobs, if
any jobs at all, or worse, they just end up dead on the streets.
Every member of Congress regardless of party who voted for the Omnibus Bill should be forced to go to a public meeting
and explain to the the D.C. Scholarship students and their parents why they voted to kill their hopes and dreams. I doubt
any of them have the guts to do so.
And President Obama, you most of all have a lot of explaining to do because you signed the order of execution.
Most of the criticism leveled at the recent Omnibus Spending Bill was about the 8,000 pork barrel projects it contained.
Oddly enough, some of the folks complaining the loudest had their snouts deepest in the trough. What was mostly lost in all
the “your projects pork but mine is necessary to the survival of the nation” between Republicans and Democrats was the death
warrant issued for the D.C. Opportunity Scholarship Program inserted by Senator Dick Durbin (D-Ill).
This program has been a lifeline to a better life for those kids who were lucky enough to participate. It gave school vouchers
of $7500 to 1,700 kids so that they could attend schools of their choice. Every year since it was established in 2004, there
have been four times as many kids applying as there were spaces. Many have attended Catholic schools and although the tuition
and associated fees of these schools were higher than the voucher, the Archdiocese of Washington ate the difference.
Forgetting the disingenuous language about helping kids “but this isn’t the way” you constantly hear from Democrats and
school choice opponents, Durbin’s sole purpose was to eliminate the successful school voucher program at the behest of his
patrons in the teachers unions. After all campaign contributions and foot soldiers are more important than 1,700 kids.
I am not going to try to argue the pros or cons of school choice. I am no expert on education, as I am sure many of the
folks who comment on this article will point out to me. Others might say that the program and others like it have not been
proven and that it needs more study. And those who support the unions will no doubt say that this will cripple the public
schools in America. From the educational products I have seen being produced by the public schools here in California, they
are already crippled.
I do want to relate to you an experience I had last year with some students from a charter school in Sacramento. I think
it illustrates what is possible.
In 1989, almost 20 years before he ran for mayor of Sacramento, former NBA star Kevin Johnson founded St. Hope Academy.
According to its Web site, “St. HOPE is a nonprofit community development corporation whose mission is to revitalize inner-city
communities through public education, civic leadership, economic development and the arts. “
Kevin had grown up in Oak Park, one of the toughest neighborhoods in Sacramento. And unlike other sports stars who pay
lip service to helping the community, Kevin put not only his money but his heart into the mission of changing the circumstances
of his old neighborhood that so many inner city kids must deal with every day.
In 2003, St. HOPE established an independent network of charter schools. Its mission statement is clear and direct, just
like Kevin.
Mission: To graduate self-motivated, industrious, and critically thinking leaders who are passionate about life-long
learning and committed to serving others.
In 2003, St. HOPE took up one of its biggest challenges.
Sacramento High was in deep trouble and it was in danger of being closed with the students shuffled off to other schools
in the District. Kevin fought with all his might to have St. HOPE take over the school and run it as a charter school. You
could have heard the hollerin’ from the teachers unions and their allies about this move from San Francisco to the Sierras.
Despite all their opposition Kevin and the parents who supported him triumphed. Ever since the defenders of the horrible
status quo have tried to do everything they could to derail this effort. Funny, you would think they would be more concerned
about the welfare and education of the kids rather than their narrow political agenda? Don’t bet on it. To them the kids are
just pawns in the bigger game of politics.
Is the program at Sac High working? I think so. I had lunch with three soon-to-be graduates last fall. It was at a campaign
event for Mayor Johnson, I was seated at a table with three Sac High seniors. They sat straight up in their chairs and their
manners were impeccable. A lot of spoiled suburban kids could learn much from these three. After I sat down they each introduced
themselves to me. There was some small talk and I then inquired about what year in school they were. They all replied they
were seniors.
When I asked about their plans for next year they all had short answers. “I am going to UC Davis”, said the first, “Cal
Poly”, said the second and the third said “I will be attending Howard University in Washington D.C.”. I was pleasantly stunned.
As I walked back to my office, I thought, all things are possible if we put our minds to it. All these kids needed was
a chance and someone to believe in them. And I believe that those three students will have a “multiplier effect” that can
help change a generation.
We cannot continue to condemn America’s children to dead-end schools that produce kids who will have dead-end jobs, if
any jobs at all, or worse, they just end up dead on the streets.
Every member of Congress regardless of party who voted for the Omnibus Bill should be forced to go to a public meeting
and explain to the the D.C. Scholarship students and their parents why they voted to kill their hopes and dreams. I doubt
any of them have the guts to do so.
And President Obama, you most of all have a lot of explaining to do because you signed the order of execution.
As the economic crisis worsens — with seemingly with no end in sight — I have been watching the TV coverage, listening
carefully to the radio and reading all the blogs. Across all media the economic experts, pundits and wannabe political strategists
tell viewers and listeners how Americans are coping with the recession. All the talk seems completely disconnected from how
real folks are reacting to the crisis.
The voices I hear are either from Washington or Wall Street — there aren’t many views from Main Street. Most of the time
all I hear, especially from the “strategists” on TV and radio is just canned political talking points, ginned up that morning
by the respective political parties’ communications departments and then distributed to various media outlets so that they
can mouth the words for the cameras like trained seals.
As we were checking out at Wal-Mart this weekend, I asked Mike, the young 20-something
cashier, if he was seeing a change in the type of customers that were coming in. Without hesitation he said,”Yeah, rich people
or people who used to be rich.”
I see and hear every day how real American — beyond the Washington-New York corridor — are coping. I make it a point to
stay connected and talk to folks from all walks of life, whether at the gas station while I’m filling up or at the local coffee
shop. What they have to say is a helluva lot more revealing than what some talking head in Washington or New York says.
I live in Folsom, California which is about 22 miles east of Sacramento as the crow flies. Folsom began as a Gold Rush
town in 1849. Most Americans might know about Folsom because of the Johnny Cash hit song from long ago “Folsom Prison Blues”
which he performed for the inmates at Folsom Prison in 1968. It’s a great place to live and raise a family.
I moved here about 12 years ago and have seen it grow and prosper. The town is managed by a strong city government and
involved citizenry. It’s like many towns across America.
And just like many cities and towns across this country, we have not been immune from the economic crisis that is gripping
the country.
Cuts have been made in city services and city workers have been laid off. Development has slowed
to a crawl and many of the restaurants and businesses I have patronized and enjoyed for years (where I personally knew the
employees) have closed leaving behind only memories and empty storefronts.
Folsom is also special to me because it is here that I met and married my wife Carol.
Carol is my window on the real world and she knows about everything and everyone in town. She was a terrific bargain shopper
even before the recession and ever since I have known her she has used coupons for groceries, and actually reads the circulars
that come with the Sunday paper so she can find the best prices. Some of the most precious gifts she has given me have come
from thrift stores.
The other night I was asking her about what she was seeing around town and how she thought folks were responding to the
tough times. She felt people were making adjustments and said, “You should see the folks lined up at the Goodwill every Monday
before opening. They are not the typical people who usually go there and there are a lot of expensive cars in the parking
lot that weren’t there a year ago.”
I asked why do folks get there early Monday and she said,”To get all the new stuff that was turned in over the weekend!”
I then inquired about Wal-Mart and Grocery Outlet, two of her other haunts. She said the same thing was happening at those
stores as was happening at Goodwill.
On Saturday we drove to the Wal-Mart which is very close to our house. She was dead right. There were more fancy and expensive
cars than I had ever seen there before and many people did not look like they were longtime Wal-Mart shoppers.
In fact, as we were checking out, I asked Mike, the young 20-something cashier, if he was seeing a change in the type of
customers that were coming in. Without hesitation he said,”Yeah, rich people or people who used to be rich.”
But there they all were, working stiffs and the “nouveau poor”, Wal-Mart veterans and rookies looking for bargains and
trying to make ends meet in a difficult time.
What I observed on Saturday was that the American people are making adjustments to their lifestyle and many are relearning
the lessons of thrift and frugality that their parents and grandparents taught them. Moms and Dads have rediscovered the word
“no” when telling their kids that they can’t have everything they want.
Folks out here in the real America are making difficult choices. They’re choosing not to spend money on things that might
be nice to have but they just can’t afford right now. They understand the gravity of the situation and are putting away the
credit cards.
Are they angry and worried about the future? You bet. But they are making the best out of a bad situation and doing what’s
necessary to survive. In that sense they are way ahead of the politicians.
What they see from our elected officials is more spending and an outright refusal to make the hard choices. The earmarks
in the omnibus spending bill are defended as if every one of them is vital to the nation’s economic health when the only health
politicians care about is their political health.
I’ve got a crazy idea. How about a grand gesture to America from her politicians? How about giving a nod to fiscal responsibility
and letting the American people know they are serious about fixing the country’s problems? In fact, how about showing Americans
that they mean business with every Senator and Congressman, Democrat or Republican telling whoever they promised that earmark
to “sorry we just can’t afford that right now.”
If they want to have any chance of restoring the trust of the American people, that would be a good start. Otherwise all
this “bipartisan” talk about fiscal responsibility is just that…talk.
An historic evening, March 7, at the Goldwater Institute in Phoenix centered on introduction
of a Charter of Liberty by Nick Dranias of the Institute.The Charter inventories
the dark, dismal problems which afflict local governments which choose not to protect, or even recognize, the freedom of their
citizens. From deliberate attempts to evade curbs on taxation increases (by setting up special districts to impose taxes outside
the people’s curbs) through evasion of the duty to promptly produce public records when requested, through the attitude of
government employees who seem to resent the public’s requests for openness, the Charter emphasizes how local government can
be the most oppressive level of government.
We all have witnessed the disconnect between local government and the fact that government employees are hired to serve
the people.Any of us who have stood in line to get a permit or license
which is required only to collect revenue outside our regular tax burden, only to meet a scowling, frowning, irritable clerk,
recognize that it is the rare employee of government who truly believes that he or she is to serve the people.How many times have you said to yourself in one of these lines, “if this clerk was working in a private
retail shop he or she would be fired.” Should we, as tax paying citizens, expect less from government workers than from employees
in the private business sector?I think not.
There was a time when maybe so----government workers were not as well paid.But
that is not the case any longer.Government employees make as much and more than
comparable positions on the “outside” world; their benefits far surpass the average benefit package of any non-union private
business, and their vacation and personal and sick leave allowances are far greater, and more expensive to the public, than
those of employees in the private sector.Most of them don’t work on week-ends,
ever, and most of them aren’t required to “stay over” until someone arrives to fill their spot.
The attitude of government employees and officials was closely criticized by a prize winning reporter and editor of
an Orange County newspaper and a professor specializing in openness of government from Arizona State. Examples were given
of needless, useless permits and licenses---required only to collect revenue.Examples
were given of violations of property rights of citizens occurring without worry or apology from the officials.Examples were given of the failure of separation of powers at the local level—with county commissioners
or city councilmen serving as lawmakers passing ordinances, executives enforcing the ordinances, and quasi-judges interpreting
the ordinances.So, the fundamental requirements of separation of the powers
of government are largely ignored at the local level.
None of this surprises most of us.For years, at Stewards of the Range,
we have pointed out that the local level of government can be the most oppressive----examples are clear in San Luis Obispo
and Santa Cruz Counties in California, and King County in Washington, but are alsopresent
in less visible rural counties throughout the nation.
Not only are counties and municipalities guilty of oppression, they are addicted to federal funds.They cannot resist applying for, and spending, federal dollars, without concern about where the funding
for the project comes from when the federal funding ends----and the answer is always: the property tax dollar paid by the
landowner.
What is a surprise, and a most pleasant
and impressive one, is that an organization as prestigious as the Goldwater Institute
has undertaken a monumental effort to remedy the evils and return local government to a position in which fundamentals of
liberty are not only recognized but FOLLOWED.
On this memorable March evening, before an audience of about 100, the Charter for Liberty was unveiled.Fitting that it was introduced in the Institute named for the conservative who served as the precursor
for Ronald Reagan---the conservative who once stated that for every new bill passed by a legislature, at any government level,
there should be at least one repealed.Senator Barry Goldwater would be pleased
at the work now announced by the staff of the Institute which bears his name.
We will write more about the Charter for Liberty in the future.For now,
it is very rewarding to note that the Charter incorporates the “coordination” process which Stewards of the Range helps local
government implement.Through the process, local government is able to
bring the federal agencies to the table to negotiate consistency between the federal program and the policy of the local government.The Charter refers to the process as the channel for restoring true federalism at
the local level, and establishing and assuring continuation of local sovereignty.
The Institute intends to work toward attaining legislative mandates that local government follow and protect presumptions
of personal liberty which are generally not observed by local government today.One
of the objectives will be legislation which mandates coordination by local governments.
It is very satisfying to have our work so recognized.And, it is very
encouraging to know that an Institute attorney with the talent, charisma, and intellect of Nick Dranias will be leading the
Goldwater Institute’s Charter for Liberty.
Every person who has an interest in making local government more responsive to the citizens, in making sure that liberty
is offered and protected at the local government level, and in making sure that there is an effort at local government level
to gain the benefits of true federalism, should contact the Goldwater Institute, thank Nick Dranias and the staff for their
cutting edge work, and ask for a copy of the Charter for Liberty.Then, start
the effort to implement the suggested reforms in your state.
As the economic crisis worsens — with seemingly with no end in sight — I have been watching the TV coverage, listening
carefully to the radio and reading all the blogs. Across all media the economic experts, pundits and wannabe political strategists
tell viewers and listeners how Americans are coping with the recession. All the talk seems completely disconnected from how
real folks are reacting to the crisis.
The voices I hear are either from Washington or Wall Street — there aren’t many views from Main Street. Most of the time
all I hear, especially from the “strategists” on TV and radio is just canned political talking points, ginned up that morning
by the respective political parties’ communications departments and then distributed to various media outlets so that they
can mouth the words for the cameras like trained seals.
As we were checking out at Wal-Mart this weekend, I asked Mike, the young 20-something
cashier, if he was seeing a change in the type of customers that were coming in. Without hesitation he said,”Yeah, rich people
or people who used to be rich.”
I see and hear every day how real American — beyond the Washington-New York corridor — are coping. I make it a point to
stay connected and talk to folks from all walks of life, whether at the gas station while I’m filling up or at the local coffee
shop. What they have to say is a helluva lot more revealing than what some talking head in Washington or New York says.
I live in Folsom, California which is about 22 miles east of Sacramento as the crow flies. Folsom began as a Gold Rush
town in 1849. Most Americans might know about Folsom because of the Johnny Cash hit song from long ago “Folsom Prison Blues”
which he performed for the inmates at Folsom Prison in 1968. It’s a great place to live and raise a family.
I moved here about 12 years ago and have seen it grow and prosper. The town is managed by a strong city government and
involved citizenry. It’s like many towns across America.
And just like many cities and towns across this country, we have not been immune from the economic crisis that is gripping
the country.
Cuts have been made in city services and city workers have been laid off. Development has slowed
to a crawl and many of the restaurants and businesses I have patronized and enjoyed for years (where I personally knew the
employees) have closed leaving behind only memories and empty storefronts.
Folsom is also special to me because it is here that I met and married my wife Carol.
Carol is my window on the real world and she knows about everything and everyone in town. She was a terrific bargain shopper
even before the recession and ever since I have known her she has used coupons for groceries, and actually reads the circulars
that come with the Sunday paper so she can find the best prices. Some of the most precious gifts she has given me have come
from thrift stores.
The other night I was asking her about what she was seeing around town and how she thought folks were responding to the
tough times. She felt people were making adjustments and said, “You should see the folks lined up at the Goodwill every Monday
before opening. They are not the typical people who usually go there and there are a lot of expensive cars in the parking
lot that weren’t there a year ago.”
I asked why do folks get there early Monday and she said,”To get all the new stuff that was turned in over the weekend!”
I then inquired about Wal-Mart and Grocery Outlet, two of her other haunts. She said the same thing was happening at those
stores as was happening at Goodwill.
On Saturday we drove to the Wal-Mart which is very close to our house. She was dead right. There were more fancy and expensive
cars than I had ever seen there before and many people did not look like they were longtime Wal-Mart shoppers.
In fact, as we were checking out, I asked Mike, the young 20-something cashier, if he was seeing a change in the type of
customers that were coming in. Without hesitation he said,”Yeah, rich people or people who used to be rich.”
But there they all were, working stiffs and the “nouveau poor”, Wal-Mart veterans and rookies looking for bargains and
trying to make ends meet in a difficult time.
What I observed on Saturday was that the American people are making adjustments to their lifestyle and many are relearning
the lessons of thrift and frugality that their parents and grandparents taught them. Moms and Dads have rediscovered the word
“no” when telling their kids that they can’t have everything they want.
Folks out here in the real America are making difficult choices. They’re choosing not to spend money on things that might
be nice to have but they just can’t afford right now. They understand the gravity of the situation and are putting away the
credit cards.
Are they angry and worried about the future? You bet. But they are making the best out of a bad situation and doing what’s
necessary to survive. In that sense they are way ahead of the politicians.
What they see from our elected officials is more spending and an outright refusal to make the hard choices. The earmarks
in the omnibus spending bill are defended as if every one of them is vital to the nation’s economic health when the only health
politicians care about is their political health.
I’ve got a crazy idea. How about a grand gesture to America from her politicians? How about giving a nod to fiscal responsibility
and letting the American people know they are serious about fixing the country’s problems? In fact, how about showing Americans
that they mean business with every Senator and Congressman, Democrat or Republican telling whoever they promised that earmark
to “sorry we just can’t afford that right now.”
If they want to have any chance of restoring the trust of the American people, that would be a good start. Otherwise all
this “bipartisan” talk about fiscal responsibility is just that…talk.
After what we are calling, “the United fiasco”,
I had a trip to Phoenix. As I warily skulked up to the gate like a dog who had been hit too much or not enough I’m still not
sure which, I already was relieved to see people already pre-boarding. There also was no sign of the concentration camp faces
I left early Monday morning. I boarded, was seated with my baggage stowed, and took off in under 15 minutes……………as I sit on
the plane my mind races with positive energy, what I can accomplish in my personal and business life, how to make the world
a better place, kumbaya. Seriously though, as I was trapped in the living hell of United Airlines web of despair the only
thoughts I had were doom, gloom, and some homicidal. Afterwards I had a moment of clarity, the people we should feel really
bad for are the United workers for who there is no escape. Imagine driving to work every day and not be able to say: I’m going
to be better than all the other airlines today. Hell they can’t even take solace in: I’m not going to be any worse than anyone
else today. I’ll bet if we did some serious research we would find two facts:
1)United Airlines has the largest percentage of
alcohol and drug abuse among employees. How else do they put up with the position their aging company has put them in?
2)Most television, newspaper reporters and editors
fly United. How else can they day after day focus on so much negative in the world without some sort of horrible experiences
helping keep you that way.
So remember don’t let the little things get you
down, and for God’s sake don’t let United Airlines help increase the number of antidepressants prescribed.
BEWARE OF UNITED AIRLINES----WHEN
CONFRONTED WITH THE PROSPECT OF FLYING ‘THE FRIENDLY SKIES’, AS FRAZIER SAID TO REBECCA’S BOYFRIEND ON CHEERS---“RUN, RUN FAST, RUN AS FAST AS YOU CAN!!!!!!
The Defending the American Dream Summit, sponsored by the
Wisconsin Chapter of Americans for Prosperity, was a huge success.Mark Block,
Wisconsin Director, did such a fine job of pulling together a marvelous program, and attracting a huge crowd.
From the Justice My Ass standpointit was a huge first outing at a conference.Staci and Jon
did a great job of manning the booth, giving out the message about the blog, and giving away free pens and mints, and selling
shirts and hats with the logo.Lots of sales.Lots of names of people to contact, and lots of new acquaintances to the blog.Lots of people who would like to write for the blog.
From the Stewards of the Range and Justice My Ass standpoint,
my speech went over very well, very well received as I urged the entire group in the morning to work hard at the local government
level to “take back America.”I pointed out that I am not one who still tries
only to prevent the taking of our liberties.I don’t have that kind of time left.I am after making progress toward retrieving our liberties, not just preventing further
taking.
Then began the day from hell.Staci and Jon left the hotel at 6am to depart for the Airport in Milwaukee.I stayed behind forbreakfast meeting, and some work.Then, at about 2pm I left for the airort, and while en route, called Jon to see whether they were home.No, it turns out that they were still in Chicago.Seems that when they got to the airport for their 8am flight, they found that planes weren’t leaving because of the
fog.But, for $25 each, out of their own pockets, they could take a bus to Chicago,
and probably arrive in time for the connecting flight.
So, they took the bus, got to Chicago just in time to run
for the gate.Jon made the last run without putting his shoes back on after security.When they raced up to the gate, they found no body at the podium even though the flight
was scheduled for 13 minutes away.When the attendant arrived, she said that
the flight was delayed by 10 minutes, then later by half an hour, then another half hour, without any explanation.Then it was announced---after a 2 hour delay---that there was a mechanical problem, that a part had to
be secured and installed.Jon went to McDonalds and interestingly enough, the
pilot had departed the plane and was getting breakfast.He told Jon that the
part change was only a matter of “half hour of wrench turning.”Finally, they
load the plane.
The plane pushed back and there was loud whistling noise,
taxied out, and the pilots kept revving engines and then turning the plane, finally got in the taxi line, and after sitting
for awhile, the pilot announced that he didn’t “like the feel of the controls”, so they wouldn’t be taking off.The plane turned out of the taxi line, and then the pilot announced that because of the lightning passing
through, he couldn’t return to the gate.So, he taxied the plane to what was
known as the “bone yard”, where there were a number of planes no longer used, or stored for whatever purpose.
They sat in the “bone yard” for at least an hour, and then
once there was an endto the lightning, they had to wait at least 20 minutes
after the last strike.As they sat, Jon tried to rest by leaning his seat back,
but the attendant told him he couldn’t because they “were in a taxi mode” even though they were sitting still in the bone
yard.
When they departed, they were told that a plane was coming
from Aspen, it would be in at 2pm and they would leave on it at 2:30.United
said “its not a new plane, but its in good shape.”So, ten minute turnaround.
I called about that time expecting to find them at home.We joked about the fact that I might get to Chicago before they left.
They boarded the plane, and then were told that a windshield
wiper was broken and it was a 10 minute job to fix it.Then a little later the
pilot said that it would be a little more complicated, would either be 8minutes more or an hour.After 15 minutes the pilot said it would be a “three hour fix”, so they got off the plane.Gathering in line at the counter trying to see what would happen every body in line got a text or phone
call from United telling them that their flight was now cancelled.Would have
to leave on the next scheduled flight at 8:30 pm.
At that point, they got new boarding passes and $10 meal
ticket, IF THEY ASKED FOR IT.THEY DID.
Meantime, I had arrived at the Milwaukee airport for my
5 o’clock flight.No way anybody on United was leaving Milwaukee.So, after waiting in line for an hour, was shunted off to a bus to go to Chicago, and again had to pay
$25 for the right to ride the bus for United to try to make the next flight from Chicago which was at 8:30pm.
As I rode the bus, I called Jon and found that their flight
had already been moved to 9:45 pm.
So, when I arrived at Chicago, and found that my flight
had now been moved from 8:30 to 10:20, we met, had something to eat, commiserated with other stranded United flyers, and waited.
Now, I am writing this as we sit, having just had a Chicago
dog, Jon has gone to find a place to lie on the floor and relieve his back pain.
Throughout the day, we have heard time and again people
say “you know this never happens on Southwest”.And, its true.I suppose they have problems, but I have never been stranded with them.They leave on time, arrive on time, and never have I been told that the plane coming “was not new but in good condition.”As we have sit this evening, looking out on O’Hare it is apparent that other airlines
are taking off and landing.But, not United.I more than strongly suspicion that they don’t have enough sound, mechanically fit planes in the air to handle their
back up here.
So, the next time it is necessary for me to fly United
in order to make an appearance, I just won’t make the appearance.I have good
luck(or better luck, lets say) on Northwest, Alaska, Horizon, Frontier and Southwest.I have nothing but bad experiences with United.To me, it looks like an airline waiting to fold, and probably should be in bankruptcy right now.The personnel are rude, cranky and disinterested.That isn’t
true of Northwest, Alaska, Horizon, Frontier or Southwest.I put Delta somewhere
in the middle, certainly not as bad as United, certainly not as good as the others.
Just to finish my dad's story we did
finally make it home about fourteen hours after we were supposed to...............FOURTEEN HOURS!!!!!!
I guess the most frustrating thing
about it is like dad said there was no real empathy whatsoever. To me it seemed like United had a big inside joke and the
only ones not in on it were the people paying their obviously unearned salaries. As I sat there barely conscious a little
girl said "I don't think a planes coming mommy". A story about a naked emperor prancing through the streets flashed through
my brain and I started laughing out loud, if everyone else wasn't as delirious as me they might have thought it strange. It
took the innocence of a child to remind us that we don't go along just because we are supposed to. The emperor was naked and
United Airlines is inept!
The Elitist Populist ( Liberalus Arrogantus) is a member of the Elitist species of which there
are three classes. The first two are the Elitist Republican ( Conservatus Rightus) and the Elitist
Democrat (Liberalus Leftus). The Elitist Populist is a close cousin to the latter. While they all
have different markings and temperament, all three coexist nicely and fiercely protect one another against America’s great
unwashed.
The Elitist Populist spends most of its time preening in front of the rest of the population displaying its plumage of
Ivy League degrees, Rhodes scholarships, trust funds, vacation homes and wealthy spouses and telling the rest of us how we
should live our lives. The “Populist” part of their name comes from their pronouncements about caring about working people
and diversity, as long as you don’t want to move next door to them. That’s about as close as they come to working folks and
honest labor because most of them wouldn’t know the business end of a shovel if it hit them in the head.
You want a real life example of the Elitist Populist? How about Senator John Kerry?
Like the other Elitists, the Elitist Populist habitat was originally limited to the Northeast — particularly the New England
and New York area — and the species evolved from the early Puritans and WASPs. Its breeding grounds are the numerous prep
schools scattered throughout that region. As the Elitist Populist matures to adulthood it migrates to the elite universities
such as Harvard, Columbia, Yale and the other Ivy League schools where many times family connections replaces intelligence
as a means of entry.
Over time the Elitist Populist has bred with other groups that they previously had shunned and kept out of their flock
through quotas, namely descendants of ethnic immigrants and other “undesirables”. This was necessitated by their declining
birthrate and desire to expand their dominance to new regions.
As that occurred, its habitat spread across the nation and it can now be found in places like
Hollywood, Washington D.C., San Francisco, and numerous college campuses across the nation.
Some great places to observe the Elitist Populist are Martha’s Vineyard, Georgetown, Beverly Hills, Palm Beach and Berkeley.
You can often find them foraging for food at fancy French restaurants, Whole Foods, and Godiva Chocolates.
Some of the places you will never find them are Lubbock, Texas, Elko, Nevada, Beaver Falls, Pennsylvania and the rest of
fly-over country where real working folks actually live. You will never see them at Wal-Mart, Food 4 Less or McDonald’s. And
they only pick up a gun or attend NASCAR races during election years.
In 2008, they finally elected one of their own as leader of the American flock and they are now setting about remaking
the nation in their own image all the while making sure they don’t lose their exalted position in the pecking order and they
can maintain their privileges and money.
You want a real life example of the Elitist Populist?
How about Senator John Kerry who comes from a long line of Elitist Populists? He wants to punish Northern Trust Bank and
any other company who receives taxpayer money or bailouts and stop them from sponsoring things like the PGA Golf Tournament
in Los Angeles recently.
But the tournament raises money for Los Angeles area charities and in the two years of their sponsorship they have raised
$3 million for those charities.
Mr. Kerry whose only business acumen seems to be marrying wealthy women does not seem to understand the consequences when
events like this lose funding or are cut back.
Who suffers, Northern Trust? Not likely.
The folks who will suffer are the small businesses like caterers and folks like waiters, bartenders, drivers, hotel workers
and all those who support the event because they won’t be working.
If Mr. Kerry is trying to punish the bankers he hit the wrong target.
It is just like when Wells Fargo canceled its Las Vegas employee recognition event that was meant to reward many hard working
employees for a job well done over the past year. Many were branch managers, tellers and back office personnel who make the
company run and certainly not “fat cat” executives.
If Kerry or President Obama, who singled out Las Vegas for special criticism during his first press conference, knew anything
about running a business they would recognize who their “elitist populist” jihad is hurting.
Let me try to explain it for them.
In good times Las Vegas fills up on the weekends when all the gamblers and revelers come to town. Most conventions and
meetings are held during the week. The Wells Fargo event would have occurred at that time.
That means that during the regular work week bartenders and waiters can get more tips, a great source of their income.
More maids are needed to keep the rooms ready, more culinary workers are needed to prepare the food, taxi drivers get more
fares, airlines make money bringing the conventioneers and so on down the service and supply chain.
Aren’t those the folks who Kerry and Obama say they are trying to help? And Mr. President they are the ones who voted for
you last November and put Nevada in your column!
And where were the political leaders of Nevada Republican or Democrat to stand up to this rhetorical bullying? Where were
the leaders of the Hotel Workers union standing up for their members? Harry Reid gave a meek “I will talk to the president”
response. The only person who did stand up was Las Vegas mayor and former mob lawyer Oscar Goodman. But I guess when you have
dealt with gangsters Washington politicians don’t scare you too much.
And it is putting fear into companies who haven’t even received taxpayer bailouts. Just the other day, Steve Wynn of Wynn
Resorts, reported that he had a company pull a $5 million contract to have a convention at his facility in Las Vegas. That
will mean more out of work service people and more empty restaurants and hotel rooms.
I am not here to defend the bankers. They are on their own.
I am here to defend the poor souls working service jobs living paycheck to paycheck trying to work as many hours as possible,
ready and willing to work overtime to support their families. To them those golf tournaments and conventions put food on the
table and can be the difference between unemployment and keeping afloat.
Elitist Populist politicians who live in the bubble of Washington and have no idea how the real world works should learn
to think before they rush to get in front of a camera and spout their mock outrage.
Americans came together today
in Milwaukee to begin to work to take back America; to bring us back to the land that our parents and grandparents loved.The Americans for Prosperity, Wisconsin Chapter, met to hear speaker after speaker
exhort them to take action, to secure the rights of Americans.Mark Block, Wisconsin
state director, put together a conference attended by an overwhelming 800 people.
The
speakers included members of Congress, the attorney general of Wisconsin, the County Executive and Sheriff of Milwaukee County,
other elected officials, members of the press, and Joe the Plumber himself. It was my pleasure to join with them in trying
to motivate grass roots movements to change the landscape of change.
I presented the coordination process which Stewards has helped move through the country for the past two years.I explained that the process is a mandate by Congress andstate legislatures to bureaucratic agencies to “coordinate” with local government, on an equal, not subordinate
basis.The process, implemented by towns, cities, counties and special
interest governmental districts, can and does bring the bureaucrats to the negotiation table on a government to government
base.This gives the local government a position of importance ahead of the general
public. Since, it involves local government, it involves the level of government most accessible to and most impacted by citizens.
The presentation of coordination as a process was popularly received, and Justice My Ass was a total hit.
Now to complete the day, it is off to an hour and half workshop on coordination.We’ll see how many of the folks really want to roll up shirt sleeves and go to work----and not just react to good speakers----because
while the process is simple, it is not easy. Requires real work and thought.
This morning on C-Span Washington Journal, Walter Isaacson of the Aspen Institute was on the
program to talk about his article in Time magazine titled "How to Save Your Newspaper". The Newspaper industry is collapsing and the heavy hitters are coming out to try and save it.
"During the past few months, the crisis in journalism has reached meltdown proportions. It is now possible
to contemplate a time when some major cities will no longer have a newspaper and when magazines and network-news operations
will employ no more than a handful of reporters.
There is, however, a striking and somewhat odd fact about this crisis. Newspapers have more readers than ever. Their
content, as well as that of newsmagazines and other producers of traditional journalism, is more popular than ever — even
(in fact, especially) among young people.
The problem is that fewer of these consumers are paying..."
Something that Isaacson said made my heart leap with joy so I fired off an
email to C-Span hoping that they would read it - at least off air if not on air. They did read it - on air. Here
is what I wrote:
Mr. Isaacson,
You made my day. You said online advertising revenues
went up and up and then dropped off and now newspapers are in trouble. It's a joke Mr. Isaacson. The newspapers
have just experienced the "pump and dump" with ad revenues. And I'm going to enjoy every single minute of
watching the decline because when my industry - IT industry experienced the same thing... the newspapers all supported
the corporations perpetrating the scam. When the same thing happened with Nurses' salaries, newspapers played
right along. Now it's their turn for "creative destruction" by fraud.
What a great day.
Thanks,
Vicky Davis
Twin Falls
He only read part of it ending before the part about newspapers supporting
the corporations perpetrating the scam but that's ok. He read enough of it to get the gist which was to identify the
"pump and dump" as something going beyond the Wall Street stock fraud. The "Pump" is the use of the media by Public
Relations (PR) people to create a perception and the "Dump" comes when the game is over. The way it works is that PR
people hired for the purpose of creating a certain perception create "News", it's hyped in the media - both broadcast and
print. The game is over when objective is achieved whatever the objective happens to be.
I became aware of the strategy when I was researching the outsourcing of Information
Technology (IT) jobs to India. The propaganda promoted by the media was that there was a shortage of IT professionals
which was pretty damn odd because I couldn't get any responses to my resume even though I was willing to relocate anywhere
and I had 20 years of solid experience behind me. Then I found out about Harris Miller of the Information Technology
Association of America (ITAA). Miller was the inspiration for the 'Benedict Arnold' section of my website (speakers on). If you click on the picture of Miller, you'll find this in his profile:
Harris Miller is an immigration lobbyist who made his
name in labor arbitrage when his firm, Immigration Services Associates was hired in the 1980’s as a consultant/lobbyist for
the National Council of Agricultural Employers. In 1982, the Council raised a million dollars for the campaign of George Deukmejian. “Between 1983 and 1990,
Deukmejian began shutting down enforcement of the state's historic farm labor law. According to the UFW: “Thousands of farm
workers lose their UFW contracts. Many are fired and blacklisted”.[1]
During that period, Miller used a strategy of propaganda
to create the image of ‘shortages’, which he then used as evidence to lobby for the increased supply of imported migrant farm
workers. He supplied the media with stories "fields full of crops, just lying there, rotting in the sun because of the
'crisis' of a 'shortage' of farm workers."[2] He then used that as evidence to lobby lawmakers to allow massive importation of temporary farm workers from Mexico
to ‘save the crops’ thereby breaking the United Farm Workers Union.
In 1995, Harris Miller became president of the Information
Technology Association of America (ITAA). Since that time, he has honed his strategy of ‘shortage’ and lobbying for
remedies. With the big money backing of the Information Technology corporations - (400, 11,000 or 26,000 members depending
on who he is talking to), he not only helped flood our labor markets with foreign workers, he used a massive media propaganda
campaign to create the image of a shortage while at the same time, he was working proactively to export our high tech sector to India.
Not content to simply use the lobbying power of the ITAA, other organizations
were spun off for the purpose of selling the idea that there were shortages and to give cover to Congress using the illusion
of 'numbers'. One such spin off for lobbying and PR supplied propaganda is Compete America. Even though the newspapers pretend there is a Chinese Wall between their editorial page and their news page,
it's simply not true and everybody knows it - most of all the reporters who write stories for the paper know it. They
know who signs their paychecks (or who used to sign their paychecks... hehehehe what goes around - comes around).
Customer Service jobs, telephone technical support, writing software
are all classified as a 'service jobs' because they involve a person engaged in an activity classed as services. Knowledge/Service
jobs - including what I did for a living were roughly 65% of our economy prior to the Internet going public. These jobs
were among the best, high paying jobs in this country. When the Internet became available to the public and Harris
Miller perpetuated his "shortages" scam to justify the export of those jobs, it was the torpedo to our economy that started
the collapse. And the "journalism" profession that Isaacson would like to save is complicit in the collapse because
of their dishonesty in the News Department and it is sweet justice to see that their industry is collapsing too - victims
of the same game they played against the working people in this country. They were suckered by manufactured perception
perpetrated by Google and Yahoo that there was going to be big money - coming is small amounts - for internet advertising.
George Soros is the master of this strategy - create a bubble by manipulation of perception - and then pop it.
The biggest misperception in this country today is in the nature of automation - computer systems.
What computer systems do is to enable the centralization of control and with the centralization of control, comes the power
to control and the power to kill off competitors to that control. That might seem counterintuitive because there are
what? 50 or 100 million PC's in this country? Where is the centralization of control? Microsoft
and Apple to a lesser extent. And by virtue of the Internet which has become the economic circulation system of
the country (and the world because of the global network) CISCO systems which manufacturers the Internet infrastructure.
And in transportation of packages and mail - Fed Ex and UPS (DHL recently bit the dust). Automation is creating a few
giants who are destroying everybody else. What the Internet did was to turn our country into one big organization -
all receiving "nourishment" from the Internet circulatory system - but only the biggest will survive when all is said and
done because of the centralization of control and the corresponding power that comes with it.
In the past week or so, I've written a quite a bit about Buckminster Fuller and to a lesser degree
- about the Futurists who were predicting the future based on the anticipated technological gains and how they would change
the world. In one of the things I read or videos I watched, someone - and I do think it was Fuller, said that because
of automation, only 10% of the people employed at that time (mid 1960's) would have jobs because of the automation - centralization
- fewer and fewer people able to control more and more resources. And he was right. And the collapse of our economic
system is the manifestation of it. The "winners" at the automation game are like giant leeches on our collective
body and they are sucking the life out of it and our extremities are dying. And because of their power to control, they
won't do a thing to stop it - rather they will hasten the demise - increasing their own power. Despite
my glee at watching the death of the faux News industry, it breaks my heart to see what's coming and to not be able to do
anything about it.
The following blog by our newest author extremely accomplished; Walter M. Brasch, Ph.D
America’s Buddy-Buddy Campaign Press Corps
by Walter Brasch
It’s a little more than a week before the presidential election, and I’m worried about what happens afterwards.
I’m not worried about the candidates, the people, or the country. I’m worried about the media. First, I’m worried about
the TV ad salespeople. For more than a year they haven’t had to do much other than sit back and open digital files from the
politicians. Now, the salespeople will actually have to go to work to fill airtime.
I’m worried about the owners of TV stations. Since January, politicians have placed more than a billion dollars
of advertising. Most of that has gone to TV ads, at least in Pennsylvania and the other swing states. Revenue is bound to
be down, and the station owners may have to make drastic changes. We can’t expect them to cut back on their golf club memberships,
the leased BMWs, or the daily maid service. It looks like they’ll have to lay off reporters. Some may think that the words
“TV” and “reporter” probably don’t even make sense in the same sentence, but that’s for another column.
And, speaking of reporters, let’s look at all the reporters. Print and Broadcast. For as much as two years, they have
been hanging onto political candidates, like leeches onto the butts of subtropical hunters. These reporters have had to stay
in sleazy 3- and 4-star hotels, eat room service food, awaken early every day, pack their suitcases, and rush to a Press bus
that would be their traveling home for 12 or 14 hours every day. On the bus they talked with each other—and some poorly-paid
and generally inexperienced campaign press aide. Occasionally, the candidates and senior staff rode the buses and talked with
the reporters.
At the speech site, the reporters
were herded into a fairly good viewing position, and expected to do whatever it is that compliant reporters do. If they interviewed
anyone other than campaign staff, it was usually someone in the audience, grabbing such great lines as “I really like Shmidhouse
Jones for President” or “I don’t trust that guy he’s running against.”
Away from speeches, they munched on campaign-provided lunches and drinks, campaign-provided news releases and speech transcripts,
and campaign-provided concierge service. If case they missed an important ad-lib, they just had to wait for the next stop,
where they’d hear it again. Late at night, if they have any energy left—and while they have plugged in their Blackberries,
iPods, cell phones, and laptops to draw new energy for a new day—the reporters and campaign staff had a couple of drinks,
“just to unwind.”
The goal of political campaigns is to keep reporters so busy, and so comforted, they won’t ask the
critical questions or take the time to find the Invisible People and their very real problems. For a month after the election,
reporters will file “What happened?” stories. After a month, they’ll get “home leave” to be reintroduced to their children,
who may have thought Mommy or Daddy were sprites locked up in cell phones. Hopefully, the reporters will also reflect upon
why they became reporters, and actually take the time to meet someone who doesn’t hang around politicians and reporters all
day long.
Freds response to nomination for Great Sports Debate:
Good nomination Chuck.Younger
generation fans don’t remember the old guys.I had the pleasure of watching George
Blanda play against my choice, Johnny U, in the playoff that 1970 magical year of Blanda’s Raiders.
Game was played in Baltimore.We
went in knowing what the old 43 year old had just pulled off----wins over Pittsburgh, Kansas City, Cleveland, Denver and San
Diego to get the Raiders into the big game.
Here’s how he did it:beat Pittsburgh with three touchdown passes and a field goal;
Got a tie with Kansas City with a 49 yard field goal
with 3 seconds
Left;
Beat Cleveland with a touchdown and a 52 yard field
goal in the
Last 96 seconds of the game
Beat Denver with a touchdown
Beat San Diego(heavily favored) with a field goal with
0 showing
Keep in mind that some of these wins came as a reserve, subbing in for starter
Daryl Lamonica.
So, when the Raiders came to Memorial Stadium in Baltimore for the Championship game, 60 plus thousand of us were delighted that LaMonica
was able to play.We had every confidence that our defense could handle Daryl.
Baltimore got
off to a fast start and led 10-0.But, in the second quarter LaMonica went down
and Blanda came in and we got nervous.He kicked a field goal and threw for a
touchdown and the score was tied 10-10.Then, Baltimore got a field goal and a Unitas touchdown and led 20-10.We feared that Blanda lighting like comeback as in Cleveland.He threw for a touchdown and the score was 20-17.We’re in the fourth quarter, and cheering mightily for the offense to keep its drives going, so that Blanda would not
get on the field.
Once in the mid fourth quarter, the offense stalled, and one of my loud mouth
friends a few rows up yelled “here comes that old ^&%$#*((.Batten down the
^&%$$ hatches.”
He drove the Raiders down close, and then threw into the end zone and the Colts
intercepted.Relief swept through the stadium.The Colts stalled and Blanda came back on the field.Again, he drove them
down and again the Colts intercepted in the end zone.This was getting too close
for comfort.Finally Johnny U threw a 68 yard touchdown pass to Ray Perkins.Colts 27-17.But, with that 96 second
scoring splurge against Cleveland in our minds, it wasn’t
certain right to the end.
The guy was phenomenal, the oldest quarterback ever to play in a championship
game, and that day I had the pleasure of watching two of the greatest field leaders in the history of football battle it out---Unitas
and Blanda.Being a Colts and Unitas fan, I was happy with the result.But, in an historic kind of way, would have been nice to see the old guy pull out another victory.
At my age today, I would have been pulling for Blanda, just as I did for Warner
in the super bowl.Again, good choice Chuck.
The last of the great giants of radio news broadcasting is now gone.As
the noted Chicago Tribune stated, in the usual Tribune understated style:
“Paul Harvey, a Chicago radio man whose melodious voice and hearty ‘Hello, America’ were cherished by millions for
more than 57 years on
National broadcasts that
were an entertaining mix of news, storytelling
And gently persuasive salesmanship,
died Saturday.He was 90”
He was, in fact, an American institution----a man who lived the American dream to its fullest.He started in radio in 1933 when, while still in high school, with a small radio station in Tulsa, Oklahoma.He started as a cleaning boy, then graduated to reading commercials and news as a
fill-in, and then to regular announcing.
Later, while in college at Tulsa University, he continued his radio work, and moved on through a series of announcing
and program director jobs until 1940 when he went “on air” for KXOK.There, he
met Lynne Cooper who was at the station on a school announcing job. The first day he met her, he invited her to dinner, and
proposed marriage.
A year later, they were married, and he and his beloved “Angel,” as he always called her, worked together on his news
broadcasts and shows from then until her passing in May, 2008.She is credited
with coming up with many of the symbols of his broadcasts: (1) the staccato style reminiscent of Bill Stern, the famous sportscaster,(2) the 10pm news hour which was so successful that it fixed 10 pm as the standard
time for news, (3)and the imbedding into the news of a surprise ending which
ultimately led to the “rest of the story” features and broadcasts.
In 1945 the Harveys moved to Chicago where he broadcast for WGN Radio,
the voice of the Chicago Tribune.He was still broadcasting for WGN in the late
50’s when my wife Lodice and I moved to Chicago for law school at the University of Chicago Law School, as kids not yet dry
behind the ears. During our first week in the “Windy City”, we decided to see
what sights we could without spending any money.We walked the Miracle Mile on
Michigan Avenue, walked the beach of Lake Michigan, visited the Museum of Science and Industry, the Lincoln Park Zoo, the
various art and natural history museums, and the Chicago Tribune Building and WGN.
It was
during a tour of the WGN building that we met Paul Harvey.We had filled out
cards when we entered the building, stating where we were from and an issue that plagued our “neck of the woods”.As we toured, here came Paul Harvey striding down the hall with a handful of cards.He strode up, said hello to the crowd, and asked which one was Lodice (he pronounced it correctly, LoDeace , one of the very few men who ever got her name right the first time), and then
talked to us briefly about where we were from and why we were in Chicago.What
a thrill to have talked to such a genuine, common folk man.
He and his
“Angel” loved Chicago, and turned down several much higher offers to go to the East Coast.The city of Carl Sandburg, the city of steel mills and stockyards, the city of the blue collar workers of America,
was his kind of town.He stayed there, he said, because he felt closer to the
real people of America in Chicago.But he and “Angel” stayed also because they
would not give up control management of the broadcasts.He called Chicago the
last of the giant cities that not only believed in American workers, butdemonstrated
that belief.
Harvey
was a cosmopolitan newscaster: he understood the minds of the common folk, that great often silent majority to whom he spoke,
yet also the sophistication of the upper class.He was called “the voice of Middle
America” and “the voice of the Silent Majority” because of his great love for this Nation and the working people who work
hard and make it that great “shining city on the hill” as it was referred to by Ronald Reagan.
Bruce
DuMont, host of the nationally syndicated “Beyond the Beltway” show, said that Harvey “was the most listened to man in the
history of radio” and that “there is no one who will ever come close to him.”
Harvey was
heard by from 22 to 24 million people per week when, in 2000, he signed a 10 year $100 million contract with ABC radio networks.
In May,
2007, Paul Harvey movingly announced that his “Angel” had contracted leukemia, and she died a year later.What she meant to him was revealed when he accepted the Presidential Medal of Freedom at the White House
on November 9, 2005:“This is the highest honor I have received since 60 some
years ago when Angel said ‘I do’”.
He never
fully recovered from her death, and his son Paul Harvey, Jr. started doing the morning radio shows after that.
So many of
his mannerisms came from her---including the “Page One” followed by throwing the yellow sheet on which the news was written
over his right shoulder.
He loved America
and he wasn’t ashamed to let that be known on every radio broadcast.Political
correctness never got in the way of the news and the truth on his shows.
He was the last of
the Giants of radio to whom those of us in our 60s and 70s grew up with,Giants
who many of you don’t even remember:Walter Winchell, Bill Stern, Red Smith,
Mel Allen, Red Barber, Fulton Lewis, Jr., George Considine, Richard Harkness, Chet Huntley, David Brinkley, the magnificent
Edward R. Murrow, Alex Dreyer, H.V. Kaltenborn.
They all had
their unique styles---and it was our loss when they passed.But, somehow, I never
stopped to realize that one day we would never again here, live, “Hello America…this is Paul Harvey.You know the news-------but, now the rest of the story.”
And, that ending:“Paul Harvey-----good
day!”
HASTODAY’S MEDIA GIVEN UP THE
“FIFTH ESTATE” STATUS
With the passing of Paul Harvey, our attention is drawn to the losses ofesteemed writers and champions of free speech who have passed during the last year
and a half.William Buckley,Tim
Russert, Studs Terkel, George Carlin---all gone from the scene.And, with this
change of an era, perhaps goes the confidence that this nation once had in the press.
Remember the story of how the little girl wrote to the newspaper to ask whether
there is really a Santa Claus?She wrote to the editor because her dad told her
that if she read it in the Detroit Free Press it was true.The resulting “Yes,
Virginia, there is a Santa Claus” has become a classic ofjournalism.
Would a child of today get that same assurance from her father, that if you
read it in the paper its true.To the contrary, probably, the reverse would be
true.
The unique style of the announcers and writers who are now gone from the scene
are just simply not present in today’s media headliners.Chris Matthews raises
his voice and yells, Olberman also raises the voice and uses sarcasm, Limbaugh just Limbaughs, Hannity just tries to Limbaugh,
O’Reilly uses obnoxious overriding to make his points, and on and on and on.A
few like David Gregory on television, David Brooks and George Will on the printed page, and Michael Savage on the radio, still
present with a unique style, and with some conviction.
But, lets face it, the writers, columnists, and announcers are not what they
once were.And, the status of the press as the “fifth estate” has dissipated.Few would rely unconditionally on the accuracy and credibility of the press.
Printed newspapers are disappearing; and as our associate Vicky Davis will
point out here on March 5, newspapers and other media sources are being “managed” by the public relations people tied to advertisers.
Dr. Walter Brasch, noted professor of journalism and communication,points out tomorrow, March 4, that the press which covers politics oftengives the candidates a “free pass”.
True to Dr. Brasch’s message, when I served Governors Cecil Andrus and John
Evans of Idaho, the press secretary always made sure to have a press release hanging on the hook for reporters early each
morning.The theory was that if they had a press release from which to work,
they wouldn’t dig around looking for news.And, it worked.
One of the streaming interests we will focus on this year will be today’s media
and how they perform.Dr. Brasch leads off tomorrow andVicky Davis’ pointed commentary follows.Hopefully they will
promote comments from readers about your experiences with the media of today as purveyors of the news and facts, and as searchers
for truth.